mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Gradient and Priors in Privacy Attacks: Leveraging Pooler Layer Inputs of Language Models in Federated Learning

arXiv 2312.05720 ↗First posted 10 Dec 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language models trained via federated learning (FL) demonstrate impressive capabilities in handling complex tasks while protecting user privacy. Recent studies indicate that leveraging gradient information and prior knowledge can potentially reveal training samples within FL setting. However, these investigations have overlooked the potential privacy risks tied to the intrinsic architecture of the models. This paper presents a two-stage privacy attack strategy that targets the vulnerabilities in the architecture of contemporary language models, significantly enhancing attack performance by initially recovering certain feature directions as additional supervisory signals. Our comparative experiments demonstrate superior attack performance across various datasets and scenarios, highlighting the privacy leakage risk associated with the increasingly complex architectures of language models. We call for the community to recognize and address these potential privacy risks in designing large language models.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2023.

Builds on

28 of 35 references.

References · 28

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  5. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  6. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  7. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
  8. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
  9. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
  10. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 958
  11. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
  12. 2016Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligencecited by 564
16 more
  1. 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 382
  2. 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 326
  3. 2021Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learningcited by 196
  4. 2015Federated Optimization:Distributed Optimization Beyond the Datacentercited by 195
  5. 2019Enhancing Adversarial Example Transferability with an Intermediate Level Attackcited by 140
  6. 2021When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Privatecited by 127
  7. 2019Federated Learning for Emoji Prediction in a Mobile Keyboardcited by 118
  8. 2021Robbing the Fed: Directly Obtaining Private Data in Federated Learning with Modified Modelscited by 108
  9. 2021Gradient Inversion with Generative Image Priorcited by 101
  10. 2020R-GAP: Recursive Gradient Attack on Privacycited by 97
  11. 2022Recovering Private Text in Federated Learning of Language Modelscited by 70
  12. 2021TAG: Gradient Attack on Transformer-based Language Modelscited by 63
  13. 2022LAMP: Extracting Text from Gradients with Language Model Priorscited by 54
  14. 2022Decepticons: Corrupted Transformers Breach Privacy in Federated Learning for Language Modelscited by 53
  15. 2022Cocktail Party Attack: Breaking Aggregation-Based Privacy in Federated Learning using Independent Component Analysiscited by 29
  16. 2022Reconstructing Training Data from Model Gradient, Provablycited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 4.

6 papers.