mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning to sample in Cartesian MRI

arXiv 2312.04327 ↗First posted 7 Dec 2023cs.LG eess.IVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite its exceptional soft tissue contrast, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) faces the challenge of long scanning times compared to other modalities like X-ray radiography. Shortening scanning times is crucial in clinical settings, as it increases patient comfort, decreases examination costs and improves throughput. Recent advances in compressed sensing (CS) and deep learning allow accelerated MRI acquisition by reconstructing high-quality images from undersampled data. While reconstruction algorithms have received most of the focus, designing acquisition trajectories to optimize reconstruction quality remains an open question. This thesis explores two approaches to address this gap in the context of Cartesian MRI. First, we propose two algorithms, lazy LBCS and stochastic LBCS, that significantly improve upon G"ozc"u et al.'s greedy learning-based CS (LBCS) approach. These algorithms scale to large, clinically relevant scenarios like multi-coil 3D MR and dynamic MRI, previously inaccessible to LBCS. Additionally, we demonstrate that generative adversarial networks (GANs) can serve as a natural criterion for adaptive sampling by leveraging variance in the measurement domain to guide acquisition. Second, we delve into the underlying structures or assumptions that enable mask design algorithms to perform well in practice. Our experiments reveal that state-of-the-art deep reinforcement learning (RL) approaches, while capable of adaptation and long-horizon planning, offer only marginal improvements over stochastic LBCS, which is neither adaptive nor does long-term planning. Altogether, our findings suggest that stochastic LBCS and similar methods represent promising alternatives to deep RL. They shine in particular by their scalability and computational efficiency and could be key in the deployment of optimized acquisition trajectories in Cartesian MRI.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 215 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2023.

Builds on

44 of 215 references.

References · 44

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  3. 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
  4. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
  5. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  6. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
  7. 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
  8. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,315
  9. 2016Conditional Image Generation with PixelCNN Decoderscited by 859
  10. 2017Wasserstein GANcited by 635
  11. 2021Solving Inverse Problems in Medical Imaging with Score-Based Generative Modelscited by 514
  12. 2018fastMRI: An Open Dataset and Benchmarks for Accelerated MRIcited by 464
32 more
  1. 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
  2. 2017Compressed Sensing using Generative Modelscited by 337
  3. 2016NIPS 2016 Tutorial: Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 284
  4. 2021Robust Compressed Sensing MRI with Deep Generative Priorscited by 284
  5. 2017GANs Trained by a Two Time-Scale Update Rule Converge to a Local Nash Equilibriumcited by 208
  6. 2018A Variational Inequality Perspective on Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 144
  7. 2019Variational Bayesian Optimal Experimental Designcited by 116
  8. 2018Variational Autoencoder with Arbitrary Conditioningcited by 68
  9. 2017On the regularization of Wasserstein GANscited by 65
  10. 2018Deep Bayesian Inversioncited by 60
  11. 2020Deep Probabilistic Imaging: Uncertainty Quantification and Multi-modal Solution Characterization for Computational Imagingcited by 57
  12. 2021Measuring Robustness in Deep Learning Based Compressive Sensingcited by 53
  13. 2020Composing Normalizing Flows for Inverse Problemscited by 48
  14. 2020Active MR k-space Sampling with Reinforcement Learningcited by 45
  15. 2020Conditional Sampling with Monotone GANs: from Generative Models to Likelihood-Free Inferencecited by 40
  16. 2020Experimental design for MRI by greedy policy searchcited by 40
  17. 2014Stochastic Backpropagation and Approximate Inference in Deep Generative Modelscited by 30
  18. 2021B-spline Parameterized Joint Optimization of Reconstruction and K-space Trajectories (BJORK) for Accelerated 2D MRIcited by 29
  19. 2019Self-Supervised Deep Active Accelerated MRIcited by 24
  20. 2019PILOT: Physics-Informed Learned Optimized Trajectories for Accelerated MRIcited by 24
  21. 2021Arbitrary Conditional Distributions with Energycited by 22
  22. 2019Learning the Sampling Pattern for MRIcited by 21
  23. 2018Learning a Compressed Sensing Measurement Matrix via Gradient Unrollingcited by 16
  24. 2022On learning adaptive acquisition policies for undersampled multi-coil MRI reconstructioncited by 14
  25. 2021End-to-End Sequential Sampling and Reconstruction for MRIcited by 13
  26. 2017A Universal Marginalizer for Amortized Inference in Generative Modelscited by 9
  27. 2018An Unsupervised Approach to Solving Inverse Problems using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 7
  28. 2022Validation and Generalizability of Self-Supervised Image Reconstruction Methods for Undersampled MRIcited by 6
  29. 2021Subtle Data Crimes: Naively training machine learning algorithms could lead to overly-optimistic resultscited by 4
  30. 2020Masking schemes for universal marginaliserscited by 2
  31. 2019Variational Inference for Computational Imaging Inverse Problemscited by 1
  32. 2020Fast Data-Driven Learning of MRI Sampling Pattern for Large Scale Problemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.