Towards Redundancy-Free Sub-networks in Continual Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Catastrophic Forgetting (CF) is a prominent issue in continual learning. Parameter isolation addresses this challenge by masking a sub-network for each task to mitigate interference with old tasks. However, these sub-networks are constructed relying on weight magnitude, which does not necessarily correspond to the importance of weights, resulting in maintaining unimportant weights and constructing redundant sub-networks. To overcome this limitation, inspired by information bottleneck, which removes redundancy between adjacent network layers, we propose textbfunderlineInformation underlineBottleneck underlineMasked sub-network (IBM) to eliminate redundancy within sub-networks. Specifically, IBM accumulates valuable information into essential weights to construct redundancy-free sub-networks, not only effectively mitigating CF by freezing the sub-networks but also facilitating new tasks training through the transfer of valuable knowledge. Additionally, IBM decomposes hidden representations to automate the construction process and make it flexible. Extensive experiments demonstrate that IBM consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods. Notably, IBM surpasses the state-of-the-art parameter isolation method with a 70% reduction in the number of parameters within sub-networks and an 80% decrease in training time.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2023.
Builds on
28 of 39 references.
References · 28
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
- 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,871
- 2016Progressive Neural Networkscited by 1,332
- 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,094
- 2018Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEMcited by 1,044
- 2020Dark Experience for General Continual Learning: a Strong, Simple Baselinecited by 895
- 2017PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruningcited by 882
- 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 793
- 2018Overcoming catastrophic forgetting with hard attention to the taskcited by 672
16 more
- 2019Self-supervised Visual Feature Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 656
- 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 571
- 2018Progress & Compress: A scalable framework for continual learningcited by 516
- 2018Learning to Learn without Forgetting by Maximizing Transfer and Minimizing Interferencecited by 511
- 2015Variational Dropout and the Local Reparameterization Trickcited by 489
- 2020Supermasks in Superpositioncited by 223
- 2021New Insights on Reducing Abrupt Representation Change in Online Continual Learningcited by 215
- 2016Information Dropout: Learning Optimal Representations Through Noisy Computationcited by 131
- 2020Efficient Continual Learning with Modular Networks and Task-Driven Priorscited by 87
- 2018Compressing Neural Networks using the Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 59
- 2021EEC: Learning to Encode and Regenerate Images for Continual Learningcited by 40
- 2017Structured Bayesian Pruning via Log-Normal Multiplicative Noisecited by 39
- 2023Parameter-Level Soft-Masking for Continual Learningcited by 39
- 2022Channel Importance Matters in Few-Shot Image Classificationcited by 20
- 2023Class Gradient Projection For Continual Learningcited by 11
- 2023Preserving Linear Separability in Continual Learning by Backward Feature Projectioncited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.