Class-Adaptive Sampling Policy for Efficient Continual Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Continual learning (CL) aims to acquire new knowledge while preserving information from previous experiences without forgetting. Though buffer-based methods (i.e., retaining samples from previous tasks) have achieved acceptable performance, determining how to allocate the buffer remains a critical challenge. Most recent research focuses on refining these methods but often fails to sufficiently consider the varying influence of samples on the learning process, and frequently overlooks the complexity of the classes/concepts being learned. Generally, these methods do not directly take into account the contribution of individual classes. However, our investigation indicates that more challenging classes necessitate preserving a larger number of samples compared to less challenging ones. To address this issue, we propose a novel method and policy named 'Class-Adaptive Sampling Policy' (CASP), which dynamically allocates storage space within the buffer. By utilizing concepts of class contribution and difficulty, CASP adaptively manages buffer space, allowing certain classes to occupy a larger portion of the buffer while reducing storage for others. This approach significantly improves the efficiency of knowledge retention and utilization. CASP provides a versatile solution to boost the performance and efficiency of CL. It meets the demand for dynamic buffer allocation, accommodating the varying contributions of different classes and their learning complexities over time.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2023.
Builds on
25 of 37 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,255
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
- 2017PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruningcited by 898
- 2018Riemannian Walk for Incremental Learning: Understanding Forgetting and Intransigencecited by 742
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
- 2019Gradient based sample selection for online continual learningcited by 571
- 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 425
- 2019Online Continual Learning with Maximally Interfered Retrievalcited by 379
- 2020Adaptive Aggregation Networks for Class-Incremental Learningcited by 149
13 more
- 2021Supervised Contrastive Replay: Revisiting the Nearest Class Mean Classifier in Online Class-Incremental Continual Learningcited by 141
- 2021Online Coreset Selection for Rehearsal-based Continual Learningcited by 117
- 2021GCR: Gradient Coreset Based Replay Buffer Selection For Continual Learningcited by 95
- 2022DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Developmentcited by 90
- 2020Gradient-based Editing of Memory Examples for Online Task-free Continual Learningcited by 62
- 2023On the Stability-Plasticity Dilemma of Class-Incremental Learningcited by 56
- 2023PCR: Proxy-based Contrastive Replay for Online Class-Incremental Continual Learningcited by 52
- 2023Dense Network Expansion for Class Incremental Learningcited by 45
- 2023Achieving a Better Stability-Plasticity Trade-off via Auxiliary Networks in Continual Learningcited by 41
- 2022Improving Task-free Continual Learning by Distributionally Robust Memory Evolutioncited by 31
- 2021A Data-Centric Approach for Training Deep Neural Networks with Less Datacited by 28
- 2023Regularizing Second-Order Influences for Continual Learningcited by 21
- 2021Data Excellence for AI: Why Should You Carecited by 14
Built on by
Not cited yet.