mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient Grammatical Error Correction Via Multi-Task Training and Optimized Training Schedule

arXiv 2311.11813 ↗First posted 20 Nov 2023cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Progress in neural grammatical error correction (GEC) is hindered by the lack of annotated training data. Sufficient amounts of high-quality manually annotated data are not available, so recent research has relied on generating synthetic data, pretraining on it, and then fine-tuning on real datasets; performance gains have been achieved either by ensembling or by using huge pretrained models such as XXL-T5 as the backbone. In this work, we explore an orthogonal direction: how to use available data more efficiently. First, we propose auxiliary tasks that exploit the alignment between the original and corrected sentences, such as predicting a sequence of corrections. We formulate each task as a sequence-to-sequence problem and perform multi-task training. Second, we discover that the order of datasets used for training and even individual instances within a dataset may have important effects on the final performance, so we set out to find the best training schedule. Together, these two ideas lead to significant improvements, producing results that improve state of the art with much smaller models; in particular, we outperform the best models based on T5-XXL (11B parameters) with a BART-based model (400M parameters).

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2023.

Builds on

20 of 38 references.

References · 20

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  3. 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,397
  4. 2020GECToR -- Grammatical Error Correction: Tag, Not Rewritecited by 177
  5. 2021A Simple Recipe for Multilingual Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 108
  6. 2023Is ChatGPT a Highly Fluent Grammatical Error Correction System? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 97
  7. 2019Parallel Iterative Edit Models for Local Sequence Transductioncited by 81
  8. 2021Synthetic Data Generation for Grammatical Error Correction with Tagged Corruption Modelscited by 56
  9. 2019An Empirical Study of Incorporating Pseudo Data into Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 55
  10. 2020Stronger Baselines for Grammatical Error Correction Using Pretrained Encoder-Decoder Modelcited by 33
  11. 2022SynGEC: Syntax-Enhanced Grammatical Error Correction with a Tailored GEC-Oriented Parsercited by 32
  12. 2019Grammatical Error Correction in Low-Resource Scenarioscited by 28
8 more
  1. 2021Text Simplification by Taggingcited by 27
  2. 2019A Neural Grammatical Error Correction System Built On Better Pre-training and Sequential Transfer Learningcited by 26
  3. 2020Data Weighted Training Strategies for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 26
  4. 2019Sequence-to-sequence Pre-training with Data Augmentation for Sentence Rewritingcited by 12
  5. 2022Type-Driven Multi-Turn Corrections for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 9
  6. 2019The Unbearable Weight of Generating Artificial Errors for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 8
  7. 2020A Self-Refinement Strategy for Noise Reduction in Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 8
  8. 2023GEC-DePenD: Non-Autoregressive Grammatical Error Correction with Decoupled Permutation and Decodingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1.

5 papers.