FOCAL: A Cost-Aware Video Dataset for Active Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we introduce the FOCAL (Ford-OLIVES Collaboration on Active Learning) dataset which enables the study of the impact of annotation-cost within a video active learning setting. Annotation-cost refers to the time it takes an annotator to label and quality-assure a given video sequence. A practical motivation for active learning research is to minimize annotation-cost by selectively labeling informative samples that will maximize performance within a given budget constraint. However, previous work in video active learning lacks real-time annotation labels for accurately assessing cost minimization and instead operates under the assumption that annotation-cost scales linearly with the amount of data to annotate. This assumption does not take into account a variety of real-world confounding factors that contribute to a nonlinear cost such as the effect of an assistive labeling tool and the variety of interactions within a scene such as occluded objects, weather, and motion of objects. FOCAL addresses this discrepancy by providing real annotation-cost labels for 126 video sequences across 69 unique city scenes with a variety of weather, lighting, and seasonal conditions. We also introduce a set of conformal active learning algorithms that take advantage of the sequential structure of video data in order to achieve a better trade-off between annotation-cost and performance while also reducing floating point operations (FLOPS) overhead by at least 77.67%. We show how these approaches better reflect how annotations on videos are done in practice through a sequence selection framework. We further demonstrate the advantage of these approaches by introducing two performance-cost metrics and show that the best conformal active learning method is cheaper than the best traditional active learning method by 113 hours.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2023.
Builds on
19 of 52 references.
References · 19
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
- 2017PWC-Net: CNNs for Optical Flow Using Pyramid, Warping, and Cost Volumecited by 966
- 2019CenterNet: Keypoint Triplets for Object Detectioncited by 654
- 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 602
- 2019BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learningcited by 428
- 2017Deep Active Learning over the Long Tailcited by 82
- 2020Scalable Active Learning for Object Detectioncited by 58
- 2018Active Learning with Partial Feedbackcited by 27
- 2019A Machine Learning Benchmark for Facies Classificationcited by 27
- 2019Temporal Coherence for Active Learning in Videoscited by 24
- 2022Introspective Learning : A Two-Stage Approach for Inference in Neural Networkscited by 19
7 more
- 2023Gaussian Switch Sampling: A Second Order Approach to Active Learningcited by 10
- 2022Patient Aware Active Learning for Fine-Grained OCT Classificationcited by 9
- 2023Forgetful Active Learning with Switch Events: Efficient Sampling for Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 8
- 2023Clinically Labeled Contrastive Learning for OCT Biomarker Classificationcited by 8
- 2022DECAL: DEployable Clinical Active Learningcited by 7
- 2022Man-recon: manifold learning for reconstruction with deep autoencoder for smart seismic interpretationcited by 7
- 2023Exploiting the Distortion-Semantic Interaction in Fisheye Datacited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
9 papers.
- 2025Hierarchical and Multimodal Data for Daily Activity Understandingcited by 6
- 2025A Large-scale Benchmark on Geological Fault Delineation Models: Domain Shift, Training Dynamics, Generalizability, Evaluation and Inferential Behaviorcited by 4
- 2025Subject Invariant Contrastive Learning for Human Activity Recognitioncited by 3
- 2024Targeting Negative Flips in Active Learning using Validation Setscited by 1
- 2025Countering Multi-modal Representation Collapse through Rank-targeted Fusioncited by 1
- 2026BALD-SAM: Disagreement-based Active Prompting in Interactive Segmentationcited by 1
- 2024Explaining Representation Learning with Perceptual Componentscited by 0
- 2026ChildGaze: A Benchmark Dataset for Collaborative Behavior Understanding in Childrencited by 0
- 2026RAIDAL: Redundancy-Aware Information Density Active Learning for CTC-Based Continuous Sign Language Recognitioncited by 0
- 2026RAIDAL: Redundancy-Aware Information Density Active Learning for CTC-Based Continuous Sign Language Recognition6 Sep 2026
- 2026ChildGaze: A Benchmark Dataset for Collaborative Behavior Understanding in Children6 Sep 2026
- 2026BALD-SAM: Disagreement-based Active Prompting in Interactive Segmentation11 Mar 2026
- 2025Countering Multi-modal Representation Collapse through Rank-targeted Fusion9 Nov 2025
- 2025Subject Invariant Contrastive Learning for Human Activity Recognition4 Jul 2025
- 2025A Large-scale Benchmark on Geological Fault Delineation Models: Domain Shift, Training Dynamics, Generalizability, Evaluation and Inferential Behavior13 May 2025
- 2025Hierarchical and Multimodal Data for Daily Activity Understanding24 Apr 2025
- 2024Targeting Negative Flips in Active Learning using Validation Sets16 Nov 2024
- 2024Explaining Representation Learning with Perceptual Components11 Jun 2024