mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FOCAL: A Cost-Aware Video Dataset for Active Learning

arXiv 2311.10591 ↗First posted 17 Nov 2023cs.CV cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we introduce the FOCAL (Ford-OLIVES Collaboration on Active Learning) dataset which enables the study of the impact of annotation-cost within a video active learning setting. Annotation-cost refers to the time it takes an annotator to label and quality-assure a given video sequence. A practical motivation for active learning research is to minimize annotation-cost by selectively labeling informative samples that will maximize performance within a given budget constraint. However, previous work in video active learning lacks real-time annotation labels for accurately assessing cost minimization and instead operates under the assumption that annotation-cost scales linearly with the amount of data to annotate. This assumption does not take into account a variety of real-world confounding factors that contribute to a nonlinear cost such as the effect of an assistive labeling tool and the variety of interactions within a scene such as occluded objects, weather, and motion of objects. FOCAL addresses this discrepancy by providing real annotation-cost labels for 126 video sequences across 69 unique city scenes with a variety of weather, lighting, and seasonal conditions. We also introduce a set of conformal active learning algorithms that take advantage of the sequential structure of video data in order to achieve a better trade-off between annotation-cost and performance while also reducing floating point operations (FLOPS) overhead by at least 77.67%. We show how these approaches better reflect how annotations on videos are done in practice through a sequence selection framework. We further demonstrate the advantage of these approaches by introducing two performance-cost metrics and show that the best conformal active learning method is cheaper than the best traditional active learning method by 113 hours.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2023.

Builds on

19 of 52 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  3. 2017PWC-Net: CNNs for Optical Flow Using Pyramid, Warping, and Cost Volumecited by 966
  4. 2019CenterNet: Keypoint Triplets for Object Detectioncited by 654
  5. 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 602
  6. 2019BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learningcited by 428
  7. 2017Deep Active Learning over the Long Tailcited by 82
  8. 2020Scalable Active Learning for Object Detectioncited by 58
  9. 2018Active Learning with Partial Feedbackcited by 27
  10. 2019A Machine Learning Benchmark for Facies Classificationcited by 27
  11. 2019Temporal Coherence for Active Learning in Videoscited by 24
  12. 2022Introspective Learning : A Two-Stage Approach for Inference in Neural Networkscited by 19
7 more
  1. 2023Gaussian Switch Sampling: A Second Order Approach to Active Learningcited by 10
  2. 2022Patient Aware Active Learning for Fine-Grained OCT Classificationcited by 9
  3. 2023Forgetful Active Learning with Switch Events: Efficient Sampling for Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 8
  4. 2023Clinically Labeled Contrastive Learning for OCT Biomarker Classificationcited by 8
  5. 2022DECAL: DEployable Clinical Active Learningcited by 7
  6. 2022Man-recon: manifold learning for reconstruction with deep autoencoder for smart seismic interpretationcited by 7
  7. 2023Exploiting the Distortion-Semantic Interaction in Fisheye Datacited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

9 papers.