Identifying the Truth of Global Model: A Generic Solution to Defend Against Byzantine and Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning (full version)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) enables multiple parties to train machine learning models collaboratively without sharing the raw training data. However, the federated nature of FL enables malicious clients to influence a trained model by injecting error model updates via Byzantine or backdoor attacks. To detect malicious model updates, a typical approach is to measure the distance between each model update and a textitground-truth model update. To find such textitground-truth model updates, existing defenses either require a benign root dataset on the server (e.g., FLTrust) or simply use trimmed mean or median as the threshold for clipping (e.g., FLAME). However, such benign root datasets are impractical, and the trimmed mean or median may also eliminate contributions from these underrepresented datasets. In this paper, we propose a generic solution, namely FedTruth, to defend against model poisoning attacks in FL, where the textitground-truth model update (i.e., the global model update) will be estimated among all the model updates with dynamic aggregation weights. Specifically, FedTruth does not have specific assumptions on the benign or malicious data distribution or access to a benign root dataset. Moreover, FedTruth considers the potential contributions from all benign clients. Our empirical results show that FedTruth can reduce the impacts of poisoned model updates against both Byzantine and backdoor attacks, and is also efficient in large-scale FL systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2023.
Builds on
15 of 36 references.
References · 15
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
- 2018Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 528
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
- 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 351
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 346
- 2020Attack of the Tails: Yes, You Really Can Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 309
- 2020Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systemscited by 275
- 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning framework for Autonomous Drivingcited by 225
- 2020Torchattacks: A PyTorch Repository for Adversarial Attackscited by 158
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Mitigating Malicious Attacks in Federated Learning via Confidence-aware Defense
- 2022Backdoor Defense in Federated Learning Using Differential Testing and Outlier Detection
- 2025TrojanDam: Detection-Free Backdoor Defense in Federated Learning through Proactive Model Robustification utilizing OOD Data
- 2025FedGuard: A Diverse-Byzantine-Robust Mechanism for Federated Learning with Major Malicious Clients ↗
- 2024Concealing Backdoor Model Updates in Federated Learning by Trigger-Optimized Data Poisoning
- 2023FedDefender: Client-Side Attack-Tolerant Federated Learning
- 2026Model Poisoning Against Federated Model Adaptation with Chain of Bit-Flips
- 2022FedRecover: Recovering from Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning using Historical Information