mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Large Language Models for Propaganda Span Annotation

arXiv 2311.09812 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2023cs.CLcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The use of propagandistic techniques in online content has increased in recent years aiming to manipulate online audiences. Fine-grained propaganda detection and extraction of textual spans where propaganda techniques are used, are essential for more informed content consumption. Automatic systems targeting the task over lower resourced languages are limited, usually obstructed by lack of large scale training datasets. Our study investigates whether Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GPT-4, can effectively extract propagandistic spans. We further study the potential of employing the model to collect more cost-effective annotations. Finally, we examine the effectiveness of labels provided by GPT-4 in training smaller language models for the task. The experiments are performed over a large-scale in-house manually annotated dataset. The results suggest that providing more annotation context to GPT-4 within prompts improves its performance compared to human annotators. Moreover, when serving as an expert annotator (consolidator), the model provides labels that have higher agreement with expert annotators, and lead to specialized models that achieve state-of-the-art over an unseen Arabic testing set. Finally, our work is the first to show the potential of utilizing LLMs to develop annotated datasets for propagandistic spans detection task prompting it with annotations from human annotators with limited expertise. All scripts and annotations will be shared with the community.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2023.

Builds on

21 of 51 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 894
  3. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 870
  4. 2020AraBERT: Transformer-based Model for Arabic Language Understandingcited by 362
  5. 2023MEGA: Multilingual Evaluation of Generative AIcited by 293
  6. 2022Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?cited by 208
  7. 2023Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speechcited by 166
  8. 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Propaganda in News Articlescited by 133
  9. 2023Large language models can accurately predict searcher preferencescited by 131
  10. 2020KUISAIL at SemEval-2020 Task 12: BERT-CNN for Offensive Speech Identification in Social Mediacited by 84
  11. 2020A Survey on Computational Propaganda Detectioncited by 70
  12. 2022Detecting and Understanding Harmful Memes: A Surveycited by 58
9 more
  1. 2021SemEval-2021 Task 6: Detection of Persuasion Techniques in Texts and Imagescited by 50
  2. 2021Detecting Propaganda Techniques in Memescited by 44
  3. 2020AraELECTRA: Pre-Training Text Discriminators for Arabic Language Understandingcited by 43
  4. 2023Using Large Language Models to Generate, Validate, and Apply User Intent Taxonomiescited by 34
  5. 2023Large Language Models as Annotators: Enhancing Generalization of NLP Models at Minimal Costcited by 33
  6. 2023Open-Source LLMs for Text Annotation: A Practical Guide for Model Setting and Fine-Tuningcited by 32
  7. 2023Multitask Instruction-based Prompting for Fallacy Recognitioncited by 23
  8. 2023LLMeBench: A Flexible Framework for Accelerating LLMs Benchmarkingcited by 20
  9. 2023ArAIEval Shared Task: Persuasion Techniques and Disinformation Detection in Arabic Textcited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 4; 2026: 8.

19 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2024Towards Interpretable Hate Speech Detection using Large Language Model-extracted Rationalescited by 16
  2. 2025FLAWS: A Benchmark for Error Identification and Localization in Scientific Paperscited by 14
  3. 2024ArAIEval Shared Task: Propagandistic Techniques Detection in Unimodal and Multimodal Arabic Contentcited by 11
  4. 2024Propaganda to Hate: A Multimodal Analysis of Arabic Memes with Multi-Agent LLMscited by 8
  5. 2024LlamaLens: Specialized Multilingual LLM for Analyzing News and Social Media Contentcited by 6
  6. 2025Can Third-parties Read Our Emotions?cited by 4
  7. 2025Hybrid Annotation for Propaganda Detection: Integrating LLM Pre-Annotations with Human Intelligencecited by 4
  8. 2024Nullpointer at ArAIEval Shared Task: Arabic Propagandist Technique Detection with Token-to-Word Mapping in Sequence Taggingcited by 1
  9. 2024Crowdsourcing Lexical Diversitycited by 1
  10. 2025ConspirED: A Dataset for Cognitive Traits of Conspiracy Theories and Large Language Model Safetycited by 1
  11. 2024MemeMind at ArAIEval Shared Task: Spotting Persuasive Spans in Arabic Text with Persuasion Techniques Identificationcited by 0
  12. 2026The Tag is the Signal: URL-Agnostic Credibility Scoring for Messages on Telegramcited by 0
7 more
  1. 2026Large Language Models as Automatic Annotators and Annotation Adjudicators for Fine-Grained Opinion Analysiscited by 0
  2. 2026CzechTopic: A Benchmark for Zero-Shot Topic Localization in Historical Czech Documentscited by 0
  3. 2026CritiSense: Critical Digital Literacy and Resilience Against Misinformationcited by 0
  4. 2026Semantically Enriching Investor Micro-blogs for Opinion-Aware Emotion Analysis: A Practical Approachcited by 0
  5. 2026Fine-tuning with Hierarchical Prompting for Robust Propaganda Classification Across Annotation Schemascited by 0
  6. 2026Cross-National Information Attacks: A Two-Decade Analysis of Troll Behavior in Koreacited by 0
  7. 2026LAAF: A Layered Accountability Architecture Framework for LLM Applicationscited by 0