mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Counterfactual Explanation for Regression via Disentanglement in Latent Space

arXiv 2311.08228 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2023cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Counterfactual Explanations (CEs) help address the question: How can the factors that influence the prediction of a predictive model be changed to achieve a more favorable outcome from a user's perspective? Thus, they bear the potential to guide the user's interaction with AI systems since they represent easy-to-understand explanations. To be applicable, CEs need to be realistic and actionable. In the literature, various methods have been proposed to generate CEs. However, the majority of research on CEs focuses on classification problems where questions like "What should I do to get my rejected loan approved?" are raised. In practice, answering questions like "What should I do to increase my salary?" are of a more regressive nature. In this paper, we introduce a novel method to generate CEs for a pre-trained regressor by first disentangling the label-relevant from the label-irrelevant dimensions in the latent space. CEs are then generated by combining the label-irrelevant dimensions and the predefined output. The intuition behind this approach is that the ideal counterfactual search should focus on the label-irrelevant characteristics of the input and suggest changes toward target-relevant characteristics. Searching in the latent space could help achieve this goal. We show that our method maintains the characteristics of the query sample during the counterfactual search. In various experiments, we demonstrate that the proposed method is competitive based on different quality measures on image and tabular datasets in regression problem settings. It efficiently returns results closer to the original data manifold compared to three state-of-the-art methods, which is essential for realistic high-dimensional machine learning applications. Our code will be made available as an open-source package upon the publication of this work.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2023.

Builds on

17 of 32 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  3. 2019Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 312
  4. 2018Explanations based on the Missing: Towards Contrastive Explanations with Pertinent Negativescited by 261
  5. 2019Interpretable Counterfactual Explanations Guided by Prototypescited by 223
  6. 2019Learning Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Tabular Datacited by 146
  7. 2021Explaining in Style: Training a GAN to explain a classifier in StyleSpacecited by 122
  8. 2020On Counterfactual Explanations under Predictive Multiplicitycited by 73
  9. 2017Inverse Classification for Comparison-based Interpretability in Machine Learningcited by 49
  10. 2020Explaining Data-Driven Decisions made by AI Systems: The Counterfactual Approachcited by 26
  11. 2021Counterfactual Explanations for Arbitrary Regression Modelscited by 22
  12. 2020Continuous Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks: Novel Empirical Losses and Label Input Mechanismscited by 19
5 more
  1. 2021Model-agnostic and Scalable Counterfactual Explanations via Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
  2. 2017A Two-Step Disentanglement Methodcited by 13
  3. 2020Latent-CF: A Simple Baseline for Reverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 11
  4. 2016A budget-constrained inverse classification framework for smooth classifierscited by 5
  5. 2021Counterfactual Explanations via Latent Space Projection and Interpolationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.