Assessing Test-time Variability for Interactive 3D Medical Image Segmentation with Diverse Point Prompts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Interactive segmentation model leverages prompts from users to produce robust segmentation. This advancement is facilitated by prompt engineering, where interactive prompts serve as strong priors during test-time. However, this is an inherently subjective and hard-to-reproduce process. The variability in user expertise and inherently ambiguous boundaries in medical images can lead to inconsistent prompt selections, potentially affecting segmentation accuracy. This issue has not yet been extensively explored for medical imaging. In this paper, we assess the test-time variability for interactive medical image segmentation with diverse point prompts. For a given target region, the point is classified into three sub-regions: boundary, margin, and center. Our goal is to identify a straightforward and efficient approach for optimal prompt selection during test-time based on three considerations: (1) benefits of additional prompts, (2) effects of prompt placement, and (3) strategies for optimal prompt selection. We conduct extensive experiments on the public Medical Segmentation Decathlon dataset for challenging colon tumor segmentation task. We suggest an optimal strategy for prompt selection during test-time, supported by comprehensive results. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/MedICL-VU/variability
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2023.
Builds on
13 of 18 references.
References · 13
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
- 2021The Medical Segmentation Decathloncited by 628
- 2017Interactive Medical Image Segmentation using Deep Learning with Image-specific Fine-tuningcited by 111
- 2023SAM on Medical Images: A Comprehensive Study on Three Prompt Modescited by 82
- 20233DSAM-adapter: Holistic adaptation of SAM from 2D to 3D for promptable tumor segmentationcited by 70
- 2022What Makes Transfer Learning Work For Medical Images: Feature Reuse & Other Factorscited by 61
- 2023Input Augmentation with SAM: Boosting Medical Image Segmentation with Segmentation Foundation Modelcited by 56
- 2020Adversarial Attack Vulnerability of Medical Image Analysis Systems: Unexplored Factorscited by 40
- 2023Towards Segment Anything Model (SAM) for Medical Image Segmentation: A Surveycited by 21
- 2023Promise:Prompt-driven 3D Medical Image Segmentation Using Pretrained Image Foundation Modelscited by 18
- 2023Probabilistic Modeling of Inter- and Intra-observer Variability in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 17
- 2023False Negative/Positive Control for SAM on Noisy Medical Imagescited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024PRISM: A Promptable and Robust Interactive Segmentation Model with Visual Promptscited by 15
- 2023Novel OCT mosaicking pipeline with Feature- and Pixel-based registrationcited by 5
- 2024Interactive Segmentation Model for Placenta Segmentation from 3D Ultrasound imagescited by 2
- 2024PRISM Lite: A lightweight model for interactive 3D placenta segmentation in ultrasoundcited by 0
- 2026SUGFW+: An Uncertainty-guided Feature Weighting Framework for Cold Start Active Adaptation of SAM in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 0
- 2026SUGFW+: An Uncertainty-guided Feature Weighting Framework for Cold Start Active Adaptation of SAM in Medical Image Segmentation17 Aug 2026
- 2024PRISM Lite: A lightweight model for interactive 3D placenta segmentation in ultrasound9 Aug 2024
- 2024Interactive Segmentation Model for Placenta Segmentation from 3D Ultrasound images10 Jul 2024
- 2024PRISM: A Promptable and Robust Interactive Segmentation Model with Visual Prompts23 Apr 2024
- 2023Novel OCT mosaicking pipeline with Feature- and Pixel-based registration21 Nov 2023