mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Don't Waste a Single Annotation: Improving Single-Label Classifiers Through Soft Labels

arXiv 2311.05265 ↗First posted 9 Nov 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we address the limitations of the common data annotation and training methods for objective single-label classification tasks. Typically, when annotating such tasks annotators are only asked to provide a single label for each sample and annotator disagreement is discarded when a final hard label is decided through majority voting. We challenge this traditional approach, acknowledging that determining the appropriate label can be difficult due to the ambiguity and lack of context in the data samples. Rather than discarding the information from such ambiguous annotations, our soft label method makes use of them for training. Our findings indicate that additional annotator information, such as confidence, secondary label and disagreement, can be used to effectively generate soft labels. Training classifiers with these soft labels then leads to improved performance and calibration on the hard label test set.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2023.

Builds on

14 of 33 references.

References · 14

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  4. 2021Dealing with Disagreements: Looking Beyond the Majority Vote in Subjective Annotationscited by 306
  5. 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 231
  6. 2020What Can We Learn from Collective Human Opinions on Natural Language Inference Data?cited by 148
  7. 2021MultiVerS: Improving scientific claim verification with weak supervision and full-document contextcited by 140
  8. 2017Deep learning from crowdscited by 105
  9. 2020COVID-Twitter-BERT: A Natural Language Processing Model to Analyse COVID-19 Content on Twittercited by 96
  10. 2022Stop Measuring Calibration When Humans Disagreecited by 70
  11. 2022Eliciting and Learning with Soft Labels from Every Annotatorcited by 43
  12. 2020'Less Than One'-Shot Learning: Learning N Classes From M<N Samplescited by 15
2 more
  1. 2023VaxxHesitancy: A Dataset for Studying Hesitancy towards COVID-19 Vaccination on Twittercited by 14
  2. 2018Crowdsourcing Semantic Label Propagation in Relation Classificationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 6; 2026: 7.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024A Closer Look at Classification Evaluation Metrics and a Critical Reflection of Common Evaluation Practicecited by 26
  2. 2024Crowd-Calibrator: Can Annotator Disagreement Inform Calibration in Subjective Tasks?cited by 13
  3. 2025UKElectionNarratives: A Dataset of Misleading Narratives Surrounding Recent UK General Electionscited by 5
  4. 2024RED-CT: A Systems Design Methodology for Using LLM-labeled Data to Train and Deploy Edge Classifiers for Computational Social Sciencecited by 2
  5. 2025Distributions In, Distributions Out: The Case for Soft-Label Trainingcited by 2
  6. 2026From Ground Truth to Measurement: A Statistical Framework for Human Labelingcited by 2
  7. 2024Efficient Annotator Reliability Assessment and Sample Weighting for Knowledge-Based Misinformation Detection on Social Mediacited by 1
  8. 2025A Dataset for Analysing News Framing in Chinese Mediacited by 1
  9. 2025Efficient Annotator Reliability Assessment with EffiARAcited by 1
  10. 2026SNCE: Geometry-Aware Supervision for Scalable Discrete Image Generationcited by 1
  11. 2025SCRum-9: Multilingual Stance Classification over Rumours on Social Mediacited by 0
  12. 2025Learning from Hard Labels with Additional Supervision on Non-Hard-Labeled Classescited by 0
5 more
  1. 2026ADEPT: RL-Aligned Agentic Decoding of Emotion via Evidence Probing Tools -- From Consensus Learning to Ambiguity-Driven Emotion Reasoningcited by 0
  2. 2026Not All Subjectivity Is the Same! Defining Desiderata for the Evaluation of Subjectivity in NLPcited by 0
  3. 2026Metric-Dependent Annotation Saturation for Learning from Label Distributionscited by 0
  4. 2026Reliability-Aware Sexism Detection: Combining DPO with Annotator Agreement and Token-Level Confidence Scoringcited by 0
  5. 2026Through the Eyes of the Beholder: Biometric and Demographic Conditioning for Multimodal Sexism Detectioncited by 0