Learning from Hard Labels with Additional Supervision on Non-Hard-Labeled Classes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In scenarios where training data is limited due to observation costs or data scarcity, enriching the label information associated with each instance becomes crucial for building high-accuracy classification models. In such contexts, it is often feasible to obtain not only hard labels but also it additional supervision, such as the confidences for the hard labels. This setting naturally raises fundamental questions: it What kinds of additional supervision are intrinsically beneficial? And it how do they contribute to improved generalization performance? To address these questions, we propose a theoretical framework that treats both hard labels and additional supervision as probability distributions, and constructs soft labels through their affine combination. Our theoretical analysis reveals that the essential component of additional supervision is not the confidence score of the assigned hard label, but rather the information of the distribution over the non-hard-labeled classes. Moreover, we demonstrate that the additional supervision and the mixing coefficient contribute to the refinement of soft labels in complementary roles. Intuitively, in the probability simplex, the additional supervision determines the direction in which the deterministic distribution representing the hard label should be adjusted toward the true label distribution, while the mixing coefficient controls the step size along that direction. Through generalization error analysis, we theoretically characterize how the additional supervision and its mixing coefficient affect both the convergence rate and asymptotic value of the error bound. Finally, we experimentally demonstrate that, based on our theory, designing additional supervision can lead to improved classification accuracy, even when utilized in a simple manner.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2025.
Builds on
18 of 38 references.
References · 18
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,603
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
- 2018Born Again Neural Networkscited by 546
- 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 422
- 2021Dealing with Disagreements: Looking Beyond the Majority Vote in Subjective Annotationscited by 314
- 2015Norm-Based Capacity Control in Neural Networkscited by 299
- 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 235
- 2017Deep learning from crowdscited by 105
- 2017Learning from Complementary Labelscited by 88
6 more
- 2022Eliciting and Learning with Soft Labels from Every Annotatorcited by 43
- 2021Learning from Similarity-Confidence Datacited by 19
- 2023Don't Waste a Single Annotation: Improving Single-Label Classifiers Through Soft Labelscited by 17
- 2023Binary Classification with Confidence Differencecited by 13
- 2020Generalized Label Enhancement with Sample Correlationscited by 9
- 2023Label Information Bottleneck for Label Enhancementcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.