Successor Features for Efficient Multisubject Controlled Text Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance in generating fluent and realistic text, controlling the generated text so that it exhibits properties such as safety, factuality, and non-toxicity remains challenging. % such as DExperts, GeDi, and rectification Existing decoding-based methods are static in terms of the dimension of control; if the target subject is changed, they require new training. Moreover, it can quickly become prohibitive to concurrently control multiple subjects. In this work, we introduce SF-GEN, which is grounded in two primary concepts: successor features (SFs) to decouple the LLM's dynamics from task-specific rewards, and language model rectification to proportionally adjust the probability of selecting a token based on the likelihood that the finished text becomes undesired. SF-GEN seamlessly integrates the two to enable dynamic steering of text generation with no need to alter the LLM's parameters. Thanks to the decoupling effect induced by successor features, our method proves to be memory-wise and computationally efficient for training as well as decoding, especially when dealing with multiple target subjects. To the best of our knowledge, our research represents the first application of successor features in text generation. In addition to its computational efficiency, the resultant language produced by our method is comparable to the SOTA (and outperforms baselines) in both control measures as well as language quality, which we demonstrate through a series of experiments in various controllable text generation tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2023.
Builds on
52 of 66 references.
References · 52
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
- 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,548
- 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,471
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
- 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 793
38 more
- 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 754
- 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 568
- 2021DExperts: Decoding-Time Controlled Text Generation with Experts and Anti-Expertscited by 434
- 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 425
- 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
- 2020GeDi: Generative Discriminator Guided Sequence Generationcited by 377
- 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 374
- 2017A Deep Reinforced Model for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 364
- 2021Self-Diagnosis and Self-Debiasing: A Proposal for Reducing Corpus-Based Bias in NLPcited by 336
- 2016Successor Features for Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 331
- 2021Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Modelscited by 294
- 2016Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dialogue Generationcited by 286
- 2019Way Off-Policy Batch Deep Reinforcement Learning of Implicit Human Preferences in Dialogcited by 283
- 2022Quark: Controllable Text Generation with Reinforced Unlearningcited by 236
- 2021Societal Biases in Language Generation: Progress and Challengescited by 201
- 2019Build it Break it Fix it for Dialogue Safety: Robustness from Adversarial Human Attackcited by 176
- 2021Challenges in Detoxifying Language Modelscited by 169
- 2020Recipes for Safety in Open-domain Chatbotscited by 168
- 2016An Actor-Critic Algorithm for Sequence Predictioncited by 158
- 2016Dual Learning for Machine Translationcited by 146
- 2021Hallucinated but Factual! Inspecting the Factuality of Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 128
- 2022A Survey of Controllable Text Generation using Transformer-based Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 128
- 2018Universal Successor Features Approximatorscited by 102
- 2016Reward Augmented Maximum Likelihood for Neural Structured Predictioncited by 80
- 2016Deep Successor Reinforcement Learningcited by 72
- 2020Text Generation by Learning from Demonstrationscited by 64
- 2020Exploring Controllable Text Generation Techniquescited by 55
- 2017Composite Task-Completion Dialogue Policy Learning via Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 44
- 2017Ask the Right Questions: Active Question Reformulation with Reinforcement Learningcited by 44
- 2022DIRECTOR: Generator-Classifiers For Supervised Language Modelingcited by 38
- 2016Towards End-to-End Reinforcement Learning of Dialogue Agents for Information Accesscited by 36
- 2022DisCup: Discriminator Cooperative Unlikelihood Prompt-tuning for Controllable Text Generationcited by 30
- 2021Medical Dead-ends and Learning to Identify High-risk States and Treatmentscited by 28
- 2017Sample-efficient Actor-Critic Reinforcement Learning with Supervised Data for Dialogue Managementcited by 18
- 2016Improving Information Extraction by Acquiring External Evidence with Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
- 2023Systematic Rectification of Language Models via Dead-end Analysiscited by 16
- 2016Policy Networks with Two-Stage Training for Dialogue Systemscited by 14
- 2017DCN+: Mixed Objective and Deep Residual Coattention for Question Answeringcited by 12
50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.