Multi-label and Multi-target Sampling of Machine Annotation for Computational Stance Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data collection from manual labeling provides domain-specific and task-aligned supervision for data-driven approaches, and a critical mass of well-annotated resources is required to achieve reasonable performance in natural language processing tasks. However, manual annotations are often challenging to scale up in terms of time and budget, especially when domain knowledge, capturing subtle semantic features, and reasoning steps are needed. In this paper, we investigate the efficacy of leveraging large language models on automated labeling for computational stance detection. We empirically observe that while large language models show strong potential as an alternative to human annotators, their sensitivity to task-specific instructions and their intrinsic biases pose intriguing yet unique challenges in machine annotation. We introduce a multi-label and multi-target sampling strategy to optimize the annotation quality. Experimental results on the benchmark stance detection corpora show that our method can significantly improve performance and learning efficacy.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2023.
Builds on
18 of 34 references.
References · 18
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 888
- 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 486
- 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 279
- 2023AnnoLLM: Making Large Language Models to Be Better Crowdsourced Annotatorscited by 171
- 2019End-to-End Bias Mitigation by Modelling Biases in Corporacited by 127
- 2020Zero-Shot Stance Detection: A Dataset and Model using Generalized Topic Representationscited by 97
- 2023SeaEval for Multilingual Foundation Models: From Cross-Lingual Alignment to Cultural Reasoningcited by 94
6 more
- 2016Stance Detection with Bidirectional Conditional Encodingcited by 93
- 2023Mitigating Label Biases for In-context Learningcited by 88
- 2016MITRE at SemEval-2016 Task 6: Transfer Learning for Stance Detectioncited by 27
- 2020Stance Detection in Web and Social Media: A Comparative Studycited by 25
- 2016DeepStance at SemEval-2016 Task 6: Detecting Stance in Tweets Using Character and Word-Level CNNscited by 9
- 2023Guiding Computational Stance Detection with Expanded Stance Triangle Frameworkcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Rethinking stance detection: A theoretically-informed research agenda for user-level inference using language models
- 2021Cross-Domain Label-Adaptive Stance Detection
- 2023Chain-of-Thought Embeddings for Stance Detection on Social Media
- 2023Ladder-of-Thought: Using Knowledge as Steps to Elevate Stance Detection
- 2025Collaborative Stance Detection via Small-Large Language Model Consistency Verification
- 2026A Systematic Comparison of Prompting and Multi-Agent Methods for LLM-based Stance Detection
- 2026Rationale-Guided Knowledge Distillation for Cross-Lingual Stance Detection
- 2025Towards Transparent Stance Detection: A Zero-Shot Approach Using Implicit and Explicit Interpretability