mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

High-fidelity 3D Reconstruction of Plants using Neural Radiance Field

arXiv 2311.04154 ↗First posted 7 Nov 2023cs.CV cs.ROcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate reconstruction of plant phenotypes plays a key role in optimising sustainable farming practices in the field of Precision Agriculture (PA). Currently, optical sensor-based approaches dominate the field, but the need for high-fidelity 3D reconstruction of crops and plants in unstructured agricultural environments remains challenging. Recently, a promising development has emerged in the form of Neural Radiance Field (NeRF), a novel method that utilises neural density fields. This technique has shown impressive performance in various novel vision synthesis tasks, but has remained relatively unexplored in the agricultural context. In our study, we focus on two fundamental tasks within plant phenotyping: (1) the synthesis of 2D novel-view images and (2) the 3D reconstruction of crop and plant models. We explore the world of neural radiance fields, in particular two SOTA methods: Instant-NGP, which excels in generating high-quality images with impressive training and inference speed, and Instant-NSR, which improves the reconstructed geometry by incorporating the Signed Distance Function (SDF) during training. In particular, we present a novel plant phenotype dataset comprising real plant images from production environments. This dataset is a first-of-its-kind initiative aimed at comprehensively exploring the advantages and limitations of NeRF in agricultural contexts. Our experimental results show that NeRF demonstrates commendable performance in the synthesis of novel-view images and is able to achieve reconstruction results that are competitive with Reality Capture, a leading commercial software for 3D Multi-View Stereo (MVS)-based reconstruction. However, our study also highlights certain drawbacks of NeRF, including relatively slow training speeds, performance limitations in cases of insufficient sampling, and challenges in obtaining geometry quality in complex setups.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2023.

Builds on

8 of 41 references.

References · 8

  1. 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,723
  2. 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,689
  3. 2018Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Spacecited by 2,041
  4. 2021NeuS: Learning Neural Implicit Surfaces by Volume Rendering for Multi-view Reconstructioncited by 1,712
  5. 2018Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modelingcited by 1,060
  6. 2019Local Light Field Fusion: Practical View Synthesis with Prescriptive Sampling Guidelinescited by 672
  7. 2022Human Performance Modeling and Rendering via Neural Animated Meshcited by 64
  8. 2022Semantic Segmentation of Fruits on Multi-sensor Fused Data in Natural Orchardscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 6; 2026: 2.

9 papers.