Human-AI Collaboration in Thematic Analysis using ChatGPT: A User Study and Design Recommendations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) offers promising potential for advancing human-AI collaboration in qualitative research. However, existing works focused on conventional machine-learning and pattern-based AI systems, and little is known about how researchers interact with GenAI in qualitative research. This work delves into researchers' perceptions of their collaboration with GenAI, specifically ChatGPT. Through a user study involving ten qualitative researchers, we found ChatGPT to be a valuable collaborator for thematic analysis, enhancing coding efficiency, aiding initial data exploration, offering granular quantitative insights, and assisting comprehension for non-native speakers and non-experts. Yet, concerns about its trustworthiness and accuracy, reliability and consistency, limited contextual understanding, and broader acceptance within the research community persist. We contribute five actionable design recommendations to foster effective human-AI collaboration. These include incorporating transparent explanatory mechanisms, enhancing interface and integration capabilities, prioritising contextual understanding and customisation, embedding human-AI feedback loops and iterative functionality, and strengthening trust through validation mechanisms.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2023.
Builds on
9 of 46 references.
References · 9
- 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 894
- 2023Extending Context Window of Large Language Models via Positional Interpolationcited by 740
- 2020Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthycited by 183
- 2023Practical and Ethical Challenges of Large Language Models in Education: A Systematic Scoping Reviewcited by 83
- 2022Human-AI Collaboration via Conditional Delegation: A Case Study of Content Moderationcited by 67
- 2023Testing the Reliability of ChatGPT for Text Annotation and Classification: A Cautionary Remarkcited by 54
- 2019MultiFiT: Efficient Multi-lingual Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 31
- 2023CoAIcoder: Examining the Effectiveness of AI-assisted Human-to-Human Collaboration in Qualitative Analysiscited by 25
- 2022Scholastic: Graphical Human-Al Collaboration for Inductive and Interpretive Text Analysiscited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2024Generative AI Tools in Academic Research: Applications and Implications for Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methodologiescited by 2
- 2025Generating Proto-Personas through Prompt Engineering: A Case Study on Efficiency, Effectiveness and Empathycited by 0
- 2026Designing Computational Tools for Exploring Causal Relationships in Qualitative Datacited by 0
- 2026Designing Computational Tools for Exploring Causal Relationships in Qualitative Data6 Feb 2026
- 2025Generating Proto-Personas through Prompt Engineering: A Case Study on Efficiency, Effectiveness and Empathy11 Jul 2025
- 2024Generative AI Tools in Academic Research: Applications and Implications for Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methodologies13 Aug 2024