mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Human-AI Collaboration in Thematic Analysis using ChatGPT: A User Study and Design Recommendations

arXiv 2311.03999 ↗First posted 7 Nov 2023cs.HC cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) offers promising potential for advancing human-AI collaboration in qualitative research. However, existing works focused on conventional machine-learning and pattern-based AI systems, and little is known about how researchers interact with GenAI in qualitative research. This work delves into researchers' perceptions of their collaboration with GenAI, specifically ChatGPT. Through a user study involving ten qualitative researchers, we found ChatGPT to be a valuable collaborator for thematic analysis, enhancing coding efficiency, aiding initial data exploration, offering granular quantitative insights, and assisting comprehension for non-native speakers and non-experts. Yet, concerns about its trustworthiness and accuracy, reliability and consistency, limited contextual understanding, and broader acceptance within the research community persist. We contribute five actionable design recommendations to foster effective human-AI collaboration. These include incorporating transparent explanatory mechanisms, enhancing interface and integration capabilities, prioritising contextual understanding and customisation, embedding human-AI feedback loops and iterative functionality, and strengthening trust through validation mechanisms.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2023.

Builds on

9 of 46 references.

References · 9

  1. 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 894
  2. 2023Extending Context Window of Large Language Models via Positional Interpolationcited by 740
  3. 2020Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthycited by 183
  4. 2023Practical and Ethical Challenges of Large Language Models in Education: A Systematic Scoping Reviewcited by 83
  5. 2022Human-AI Collaboration via Conditional Delegation: A Case Study of Content Moderationcited by 67
  6. 2023Testing the Reliability of ChatGPT for Text Annotation and Classification: A Cautionary Remarkcited by 54
  7. 2019MultiFiT: Efficient Multi-lingual Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 31
  8. 2023CoAIcoder: Examining the Effectiveness of AI-assisted Human-to-Human Collaboration in Qualitative Analysiscited by 25
  9. 2022Scholastic: Graphical Human-Al Collaboration for Inductive and Interpretive Text Analysiscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.