Regret Analysis of Learning-Based Linear Quadratic Gaussian Control with Additive Exploration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we analyze the regret incurred by a computationally efficient exploration strategy, known as naive exploration, for controlling unknown partially observable systems within the Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) framework. We introduce a two-phase control algorithm called LQG-NAIVE, which involves an initial phase of injecting Gaussian input signals to obtain a system model, followed by a second phase of an interplay between naive exploration and control in an episodic fashion. We show that LQG-NAIVE achieves a regret growth rate of tildeO(√T), i.e., O(√T) up to logarithmic factors after T time steps, and we validate its performance through numerical simulations. Additionally, we propose LQG-IF2E, which extends the exploration signal to a `closed-loop' setting by incorporating the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM). We provide compelling numerical evidence of the competitive performance of LQG-IF2E compared to LQG-NAIVE.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2023.
Builds on
7 of 19 references.
References · 7
- 2020Naive Exploration is Optimal for Online LQRcited by 111
- 2019Finite Sample Analysis of Stochastic System Identificationcited by 67
- 2022Statistical Learning Theory for Control: A Finite Sample Perspectivecited by 52
- 2020Logarithmic Regret Bound in Partially Observable Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 46
- 2019From self-tuning regulators to reinforcement learning and back againcited by 17
- 2019Nonparametric Finite Time LTI System Identificationcited by 11
- 2020On Uninformative Optimal Policies in Adaptive LQR with Unknown B-Matrixcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026SCaLE: Switching Cost aware Learning and Explorationcited by 0
- 2026SCaLE: Switching Cost aware Learning and Exploration14 Jan 2026