mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Regret Analysis of Learning-Based Linear Quadratic Gaussian Control with Additive Exploration

arXiv 2311.02679 ↗First posted 5 Nov 2023eess.SY cs.LG cs.SYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we analyze the regret incurred by a computationally efficient exploration strategy, known as naive exploration, for controlling unknown partially observable systems within the Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) framework. We introduce a two-phase control algorithm called LQG-NAIVE, which involves an initial phase of injecting Gaussian input signals to obtain a system model, followed by a second phase of an interplay between naive exploration and control in an episodic fashion. We show that LQG-NAIVE achieves a regret growth rate of tildeO(√T), i.e., O(√T) up to logarithmic factors after T time steps, and we validate its performance through numerical simulations. Additionally, we propose LQG-IF2E, which extends the exploration signal to a `closed-loop' setting by incorporating the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM). We provide compelling numerical evidence of the competitive performance of LQG-IF2E compared to LQG-NAIVE.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2023.

Builds on

7 of 19 references.

References · 7

  1. 2020Naive Exploration is Optimal for Online LQRcited by 111
  2. 2019Finite Sample Analysis of Stochastic System Identificationcited by 67
  3. 2022Statistical Learning Theory for Control: A Finite Sample Perspectivecited by 52
  4. 2020Logarithmic Regret Bound in Partially Observable Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 46
  5. 2019From self-tuning regulators to reinforcement learning and back againcited by 17
  6. 2019Nonparametric Finite Time LTI System Identificationcited by 11
  7. 2020On Uninformative Optimal Policies in Adaptive LQR with Unknown B-Matrixcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.