mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Alignment Problem in Context

arXiv 2311.02147 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

A core challenge in the development of increasingly capable AI systems is to make them safe and reliable by ensuring their behaviour is consistent with human values. This challenge, known as the alignment problem, does not merely apply to hypothetical future AI systems that may pose catastrophic risks; it already applies to current systems, such as large language models, whose potential for harm is rapidly increasing. In this paper, I assess whether we are on track to solve the alignment problem for large language models, and what that means for the safety of future AI systems. I argue that existing strategies for alignment are insufficient, because large language models remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks that can reliably elicit unsafe behaviour. I offer an explanation of this lingering vulnerability on which it is not simply a contingent limitation of current language models, but has deep technical ties to a crucial aspect of what makes these models useful and versatile in the first place -- namely, their remarkable aptitude to learn "in context" directly from user instructions. It follows that the alignment problem is not only unsolved for current AI systems, but may be intrinsically difficult to solve without severely undermining their capabilities. Furthermore, this assessment raises concerns about the prospect of ensuring the safety of future and more capable AI systems.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 1 of its 111 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2023.

Builds on

1 of 111 references.

References · 1

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024The AI Alignment Paradox
  2. 2023Large Language Model Alignment: A Survey
  3. 2026Alignment Risks from Capability-Seeking RL Training
  4. 2025Revealing the Intrinsic Ethical Vulnerability of Aligned Large Language Models
  5. 2023Fundamental Limitations of Alignment in Large Language Models
  6. 2025Alignment and Safety in Large Language Models: Safety Mechanisms, Training Paradigms, and Emerging Challenges
  7. 2023Of Models and Tin Men: A Behavioural Economics Study of Principal-Agent Problems in AI Alignment using Large-Language Models
  8. 2025Normative Conflicts and Shallow AI Alignment