Terrain-Informed Self-Supervised Learning: Enhancing Building Footprint Extraction from LiDAR Data with Limited Annotations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Estimating building footprint maps from geospatial data is of paramount importance in urban planning, development, disaster management, and various other applications. Deep learning methodologies have gained prominence in building segmentation maps, offering the promise of precise footprint extraction without extensive post-processing. However, these methods face challenges in generalization and label efficiency, particularly in remote sensing, where obtaining accurate labels can be both expensive and time-consuming. To address these challenges, we propose terrain-aware self-supervised learning, tailored to remote sensing, using digital elevation models from LiDAR data. We propose to learn a model to differentiate between bare Earth and superimposed structures enabling the network to implicitly learn domain-relevant features without the need for extensive pixel-level annotations. We test the effectiveness of our approach by evaluating building segmentation performance on test datasets with varying label fractions. Remarkably, with only 1% of the labels (equivalent to 25 labeled examples), our method improves over ImageNet pre-training, showing the advantage of leveraging unlabeled data for feature extraction in the domain of remote sensing. The performance improvement is more pronounced in few-shot scenarios and gradually closes the gap with ImageNet pre-training as the label fraction increases. We test on a dataset characterized by substantial distribution shifts and labeling errors to demonstrate the generalizability of our approach. When compared to other baselines, including ImageNet pretraining and more complex architectures, our approach consistently performs better, demonstrating the efficiency and effectiveness of self-supervised terrain-aware feature learning.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2023.
Builds on
22 of 47 references.
References · 22
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,859
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
- 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,940
- 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,933
- 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
- 2017Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentationscited by 620
10 more
- 2021Self-supervised Pretraining of Visual Features in the Wildcited by 198
- 2020Geography-Aware Self-Supervised Learningcited by 190
- 2022Transformers in Remote Sensing: A Surveycited by 61
- 2019Geo-Aware Networks for Fine-Grained Recognitioncited by 44
- 2020Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification with Self-Supervised Paradigm under Limited Labeled Samplescited by 36
- 2020The color out of space: learning self-supervised representations for Earth Observation imagerycited by 34
- 2018Learning to Interpret Satellite Images Using Wikipediacited by 12
- 2018Deep Learning Approach for Building Detection in Satellite Multispectral Imagerycited by 6
- 2023BuildSeg: A General Framework for the Segmentation of Buildingscited by 6
- 2022Sampling Strategy for Fine-Tuning Segmentation Models to Crisis Area under Scarcity of Datacited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.