Graph Matching via convex relaxation to the simplex
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper addresses the Graph Matching problem, which consists of finding the best possible alignment between two input graphs, and has many applications in computer vision, network deanonymization and protein alignment. A common approach to tackle this problem is through convex relaxations of the NP-hard Quadratic Assignment Problem (QAP). Here, we introduce a new convex relaxation onto the unit simplex and develop an efficient mirror descent scheme with closed-form iterations for solving this problem. Under the correlated Gaussian Wigner model, we show that the simplex relaxation admits a unique solution with high probability. In the noiseless case, this is shown to imply exact recovery of the ground truth permutation. Additionally, we establish a novel sufficiency condition for the input matrix in standard greedy rounding methods, which is less restrictive than the commonly used `diagonal dominance' condition. We use this condition to show exact one-step recovery of the ground truth (holding almost surely) via the mirror descent scheme, in the noiseless setting. We also use this condition to obtain significantly improved conditions for the GRAMPA algorithm [Fan et al. 2019] in the noiseless setting.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2023.
Builds on
24 of 72 references.
References · 24
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
- 2014Convex Optimization: Algorithms and Complexitycited by 569
- 2018Efficient random graph matching via degree profilescited by 48
- 2021Settling the Sharp Reconstruction Thresholds of Random Graph Matchingcited by 45
- 2017Exact alignment recovery for correlated ErdHos-R'enyi graphscited by 35
- 2014Graph Matching: Relax at Your Own Riskcited by 27
- 2019Spectral Graph Matching and Regularized Quadratic Relaxations II: ErdHos-R'enyi Graphs and Universalitycited by 27
- 2020Partial Recovery in the Graph Alignment Problemcited by 27
- 2020From tree matching to sparse graph alignmentcited by 26
- 2022Random graph matching at Otter's threshold via counting chandelierscited by 25
- 2021Exact Matching of Random Graphs with Constant Correlationcited by 23
- 2021Testing network correlation efficiently via counting treescited by 22
12 more
- 2022Random Graph Matching in Geometric Models: the Case of Complete Graphscited by 22
- 2021Impossibility of Partial Recovery in the Graph Alignment Problemcited by 21
- 2020Learning compositional functions via multiplicative weight updatescited by 20
- 2020Sharp threshold for alignment of graph databases with Gaussian weightscited by 16
- 2015Spectral Sparsification and Regret Minimization Beyond Matrix Multiplicative Updatescited by 14
- 2016Spectral Alignment of Graphscited by 12
- 2022Statistical limits of correlation detection in treescited by 12
- 2020Graph Matching with Partially-Correct Seedscited by 10
- 2019Spectral Alignment of Correlated Gaussian matricescited by 6
- 2022Seeded graph matching for the correlated Gaussian Wigner model via the projected power methodcited by 4
- 2014An Efficient Algorithm for Unweighted Spectral Graph Sparsificationcited by 3
- 2016On the Structure and Efficient Computation of IsoRank Node Similaritiescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.