mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sharp threshold for alignment of graph databases with Gaussian weights

arXiv 2010.16295 ↗First posted 30 Oct 2020stat.ML cs.LG math.PRcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the fundamental limits for reconstruction in weighted graph (or matrix) database alignment. We consider a model of two graphs where π^* is a planted uniform permutation and all pairs of edge weights (Ai,j, Bπ^*(i),π^*(j))1 ≤ i<j ≤ n are i.i.d. pairs of Gaussian variables with zero mean, unit variance and correlation parameter ρ ∈ [0,1]. We prove that there is a sharp threshold for exact recovery of π^*: if n ρ2 ≥ (4+ε) log n + ω(1) for some ε>0, there is an estimator hatπ -- namely the MAP estimator -- based on the observation of databases A,B that achieves exact reconstruction with high probability. Conversely, if n ρ2 ≤ 4 log n - log log n - ω(1), then any estimator hatπ verifies hatπ=π with probability o(1). This result shows that the information-theoretic threshold for exact recovery is the same as the one obtained for detection in a recent work by Wu et al. (2020): in other words, for Gaussian weighted graph alignment, the problem of reconstruction is not more difficult than that of detection. Though the reconstruction task was already well understood for vector-shaped database alignment (that is taking signal of the form (ui, vπ^*(i))1 ≤ i≤ n where (ui, vπ^*(i)) are i.i.d. pairs in ℝdu × ℝdv), its formulation for graph (or matrix) databases brings a drastically different problem for which the hard phase is conjectured to be wide. The proofs build upon the analysis of the MAP estimator and the second moment method, together with the study of the correlation structure of energies of permutations.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

16 papers.

Sort: