mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Seeded graph matching for the correlated Gaussian Wigner model via the projected power method

arXiv 2204.04099 ↗First posted 8 Apr 2022math.ST stat.ML stat.THcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the graph matching problem we observe two graphs G,H and the goal is to find an assignment (or matching) between their vertices such that some measure of edge agreement is maximized. We assume in this work that the observed pair G,H has been drawn from the Correlated Gaussian Wigner (CGW) model -- a popular model for correlated weighted graphs -- where the entries of the adjacency matrices of G and H are independent Gaussians and each edge of G is correlated with one edge of H (determined by the unknown matching) with the edge correlation described by a parameter σ∈ [0,1). In this paper, we analyse the performance of the projected power method (PPM) as a seeded graph matching algorithm where we are given an initial partially correct matching (called the seed) as side information. We prove that if the seed is close enough to the ground-truth matching, then with high probability, PPM iteratively improves the seed and recovers the ground-truth matching (either partially or exactly) in O(log n) iterations. Our results prove that PPM works even in regimes of constant σ, thus extending the analysis in (Mao et al. 2023) for the sparse Correlated Erdos-Renyi(CER) model to the (dense) CGW model. As a byproduct of our analysis, we see that the PPM framework generalizes some of the state-of-art algorithms for seeded graph matching. We support and complement our theoretical findings with numerical experiments on synthetic data.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2022.

Builds on

27 of 55 references.

References · 27

  1. 2018Nonconvex Optimization Meets Low-Rank Matrix Factorization: An Overviewcited by 159
  2. 2019Scalable Gromov-Wasserstein Learning for Graph Partitioning and Matchingcited by 102
  3. 2018Efficient random graph matching via degree profilescited by 48
  4. 2021Settling the Sharp Reconstruction Thresholds of Random Graph Matchingcited by 45
  5. 2017Exact alignment recovery for correlated ErdHos-R'enyi graphscited by 35
  6. 2016Nonconvex phase synchronizationcited by 30
  7. 2014Graph Matching: Relax at Your Own Riskcited by 27
  8. 2018Seeded Graph Matching via Large Neighborhood Statisticscited by 27
  9. 2020Partial Recovery in the Graph Alignment Problemcited by 27
  10. 2020From tree matching to sparse graph alignmentcited by 26
  11. 2018Higher-order Projected Power Iterations for Scalable Multi-Matchingcited by 24
  12. 2021Exact Matching of Random Graphs with Constant Correlationcited by 23
15 more
  1. 2021Correlated Stochastic Block Models: Exact Graph Matching with Applications to Recovering Communitiescited by 22
  2. 2022Random Graph Matching in Geometric Models: the Case of Complete Graphscited by 22
  3. 2019Iterative Algorithm for Discrete Structure Recoverycited by 21
  4. 2016The Projected Power Method: An Efficient Algorithm for Joint Alignment from Pairwise Differencescited by 15
  5. 2014Maximum Quadratic Assignment Problem: Reduction from Maximum Label Cover and LP-based Approximation Algorithmcited by 13
  6. 2016Spectral Alignment of Graphscited by 12
  7. 2021Strong recovery of geometric planted matchingscited by 12
  8. 2020Graph Matching with Partially-Correct Seedscited by 10
  9. 2021Optimal Non-Convex Exact Recovery in Stochastic Block Model via Projected Power Methodcited by 10
  10. 2021The Power of D-hops in Matching Power-Law Graphscited by 7
  11. 2019Spectral Alignment of Correlated Gaussian matricescited by 6
  12. 2021Optimal Orthogonal Group Synchronization and Rotation Group Synchronizationcited by 4
  13. 2016On the Structure and Efficient Computation of IsoRank Node Similaritiescited by 3
  14. 2017Projected Power Iteration for Network Alignmentcited by 3
  15. 2022Exact Community Recovery over Signed Graphscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2.

4 papers.