Interactive Multi-fidelity Learning for Cost-effective Adaptation of Language Model with Sparse Human Supervision
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various tasks. However, their suitability for domain-specific tasks, is limited due to their immense scale at deployment, susceptibility to misinformation, and more importantly, high data annotation costs. We propose a novel Interactive Multi-Fidelity Learning (IMFL) framework for the cost-effective development of small domain-specific LMs under limited annotation budgets. Our approach formulates the domain-specific fine-tuning process as a multi-fidelity learning problem, focusing on identifying the optimal acquisition strategy that balances between low-fidelity automatic LLM annotations and high-fidelity human annotations to maximize model performance. We further propose an exploration-exploitation query strategy that enhances annotation diversity and informativeness, incorporating two innovative designs: 1) prompt retrieval that selects in-context examples from human-annotated samples to improve LLM annotation, and 2) variable batch size that controls the order for choosing each fidelity to facilitate knowledge distillation, ultimately enhancing annotation quality. Extensive experiments on financial and medical tasks demonstrate that IMFL achieves superior performance compared with single fidelity annotations. Given a limited budget of human annotation, IMFL significantly outperforms the human annotation baselines in all four tasks and achieves very close performance as human annotations on two of the tasks. These promising results suggest that the high human annotation costs in domain-specific tasks can be significantly reduced by employing IMFL, which utilizes fewer human annotations, supplemented with cheaper and faster LLM (e.g., GPT-3.5) annotations to achieve comparable performance.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2023.
Builds on
47 of 56 references.
References · 47
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,935
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,324
- 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,271
35 more
- 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,184
- 2023BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Financecited by 923
- 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 888
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 787
- 2023Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizescited by 710
- 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 695
- 2023Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problemscited by 630
- 2022BioGPT: Generative Pre-trained Transformer for Biomedical Text Generation and Miningcited by 531
- 2019ClinicalBERT: Modeling Clinical Notes and Predicting Hospital Readmissioncited by 487
- 2023Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyondcited by 409
- 2013Good Debt or Bad Debt: Detecting Semantic Orientations in Economic Textscited by 310
- 2022Reducing Activation Recomputation in Large Transformer Modelscited by 300
- 2022Selective Annotation Makes Language Models Better Few-Shot Learnerscited by 242
- 2021Want To Reduce Labeling Cost? GPT-3 Can Helpcited by 196
- 2023Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speechcited by 165
- 2021Active Learning by Acquiring Contrastive Examplescited by 154
- 2023Active Prompting with Chain-of-Thought for Large Language Modelscited by 154
- 2018Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimizationcited by 141
- 2021Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example Difficultycited by 139
- 2020Cold-start Active Learning through Self-supervised Language Modelingcited by 128
- 2023ChatGPT-4 Outperforms Experts and Crowd Workers in Annotating Political Twitter Messages with Zero-Shot Learningcited by 97
- 2023Can ChatGPT Reproduce Human-Generated Labels? A Study of Social Computing Taskscited by 88
- 2023Cognitive Mirage: A Review of Hallucinations in Large Language Modelscited by 83
- 2020Impact of News on the Commodity Market: Dataset and Resultscited by 80
- 2021Revisiting Uncertainty-based Query Strategies for Active Learning with Transformerscited by 59
- 2019Distribution Density, Tails, and Outliers in Machine Learning: Metrics and Applicationscited by 43
- 2022A Survey of Active Learning for Natural Language Processingcited by 40
- 2022Active Learning Helps Pretrained Models Learn the Intended Taskcited by 33
- 2023Evaluation of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 for supporting real-world information needs in healthcare deliverycited by 30
- 2020Fine-tuning BERT for Low-Resource Natural Language Understanding via Active Learningcited by 25
- 2020Deep Multi-Fidelity Active Learning of High-dimensional Outputscited by 22
- 2020Modern Monte Carlo Methods for Efficient Uncertainty Quantification and Propagation: A Surveycited by 21
- 2022Batch Multi-Fidelity Active Learning with Budget Constraintscited by 20
- 2022Cold-Start Data Selection for Few-shot Language Model Fine-tuning: A Prompt-Based Uncertainty Propagation Approachcited by 16
- 2022Towards Computationally Feasible Deep Active Learningcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025From Selection to Generation: A Survey of LLM-based Active Learningcited by 18
- 2024Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignmentcited by 15
- 2025Collaborative Evolution: Multi-Round Learning Between Large and Small Language Models for Emergent Fake News Detectioncited by 5
- 2026Learn More with Less: Uncertainty Consistency Guided Query Selection for RLVRcited by 1
- 2026Learn More with Less: Uncertainty Consistency Guided Query Selection for RLVR30 Jan 2026
- 2025Collaborative Evolution: Multi-Round Learning Between Large and Small Language Models for Emergent Fake News Detection27 Mar 2025
- 2025From Selection to Generation: A Survey of LLM-based Active Learning17 Feb 2025
- 2024Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment13 Jun 2024