VDIP-TGV: Blind Image Deconvolution via Variational Deep Image Prior Empowered by Total Generalized Variation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recovering clear images from blurry ones with an unknown blur kernel is a challenging problem. Deep image prior (DIP) proposes to use the deep network as a regularizer for a single image rather than as a supervised model, which achieves encouraging results in the nonblind deblurring problem. However, since the relationship between images and the network architectures is unclear, it is hard to find a suitable architecture to provide sufficient constraints on the estimated blur kernels and clean images. Also, DIP uses the sparse maximum a posteriori (MAP), which is insufficient to enforce the selection of the recovery image. Recently, variational deep image prior (VDIP) was proposed to impose constraints on both blur kernels and recovery images and take the standard deviation of the image into account during the optimization process by the variational principle. However, we empirically find that VDIP struggles with processing image details and tends to generate suboptimal results when the blur kernel is large. Therefore, we combine total generalized variational (TGV) regularization with VDIP in this paper to overcome these shortcomings of VDIP. TGV is a flexible regularization that utilizes the characteristics of partial derivatives of varying orders to regularize images at different scales, reducing oil painting artifacts while maintaining sharp edges. The proposed VDIP-TGV effectively recovers image edges and details by supplementing extra gradient information through TGV. Additionally, this model is solved by the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), which effectively combines traditional algorithms and deep learning methods. Experiments show that our proposed VDIP-TGV surpasses various state-of-the-art models quantitatively and qualitatively.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2023.
Builds on
23 of 58 references.
References · 23
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
- 2021Restormer: Efficient Transformer for High-Resolution Image Restorationcited by 1,618
- 2017Deep Image Priorcited by 1,097
- 2021Uformer: A General U-Shaped Transformer for Image Restorationcited by 864
- 2016Deep Multi-scale Convolutional Neural Network for Dynamic Scene Deblurringcited by 722
- 2022Simple Baselines for Image Restorationcited by 701
- 2019DeblurGAN-v2: Deblurring (Orders-of-Magnitude) Faster and Bettercited by 361
- 2018Scale-recurrent Network for Deep Image Deblurringcited by 332
- 2021Rethinking Coarse-to-Fine Approach in Single Image Deblurringcited by 324
- 2015Learning a Convolutional Neural Network for Non-uniform Motion Blur Removalcited by 148
- 2018"Double-DIP": Unsupervised Image Decomposition via Coupled Deep-Image-Priorscited by 114
- 2019Neural Blind Deconvolution Using Deep Priorscited by 113
11 more
- 2016A Neural Approach to Blind Motion Deblurringcited by 69
- 2018Image Restoration using Total Variation Regularized Deep Image Priorcited by 65
- 2019A Bayesian Perspective on the Deep Image Priorcited by 52
- 2019Fast and Provable ADMM for Learning with Generative Priorscited by 18
- 2013Revisiting Bayesian Blind Deconvolutioncited by 7
- 2018On the Equivalence of Inexact Proximal ALM and ADMM for a Class of Convex Composite Programmingcited by 5
- 2019On the Global Geometry of Sphere-Constrained Sparse Blind Deconvolutioncited by 5
- 2022Blind Image Deconvolution Using Variational Deep Image Priorcited by 5
- 2022Deep Idempotent Network for Efficient Single Image Blind Deblurringcited by 4
- 2014Bi-l0-l2-Norm Regularization for Blind Motion Deblurringcited by 2
- 2020Inverse problems with second-order Total Generalized Variation constraintscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.