mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Assessment of Differentially Private Synthetic Data for Utility and Fairness in End-to-End Machine Learning Pipelines for Tabular Data

arXiv 2310.19250 ↗First posted 30 Oct 2023cs.LG cs.CRcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Differentially private (DP) synthetic data sets are a solution for sharing data while preserving the privacy of individual data providers. Understanding the effects of utilizing DP synthetic data in end-to-end machine learning pipelines impacts areas such as health care and humanitarian action, where data is scarce and regulated by restrictive privacy laws. In this work, we investigate the extent to which synthetic data can replace real, tabular data in machine learning pipelines and identify the most effective synthetic data generation techniques for training and evaluating machine learning models. We investigate the impacts of differentially private synthetic data on downstream classification tasks from the point of view of utility as well as fairness. Our analysis is comprehensive and includes representatives of the two main types of synthetic data generation algorithms: marginal-based and GAN-based. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first that: (i) proposes a training and evaluation framework that does not assume that real data is available for testing the utility and fairness of machine learning models trained on synthetic data; (ii) presents the most extensive analysis of synthetic data set generation algorithms in terms of utility and fairness when used for training machine learning models; and (iii) encompasses several different definitions of fairness. Our findings demonstrate that marginal-based synthetic data generators surpass GAN-based ones regarding model training utility for tabular data. Indeed, we show that models trained using data generated by marginal-based algorithms can exhibit similar utility to models trained using real data. Our analysis also reveals that the marginal-based synthetic data generator MWEM PGM can train models that simultaneously achieve utility and fairness characteristics close to those obtained by models trained with real data.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2023.

Builds on

28 of 55 references.

References · 28

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  2. 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 699
  3. 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 348
  4. 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
  5. 2018Differentially Private Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 235
  6. 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
  7. 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
  8. 2021Winning the NIST Contest: A scalable and general approach to differentially private synthetic datacited by 102
  9. 2021Benchmarking Differentially Private Synthetic Data Generation Algorithmscited by 81
  10. 2019Graphical-model based estimation and inference for differential privacycited by 74
  11. 2022Synthetic Data -- what, why and how?cited by 67
  12. 2018A Moral Framework for Understanding of Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunitycited by 53
16 more
  1. 2019Diffprivlib: The IBM Differential Privacy Librarycited by 53
  2. 2021Robin Hood and Matthew Effects: Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Synthetic Datacited by 48
  3. 2020Fair Bayesian Optimizationcited by 45
  4. 2017Privacy Loss in Apple's Implementation of Differential Privacy on MacOS 10.12cited by 43
  5. 2022A Multifaceted Benchmarking of Synthetic Electronic Health Record Generation Modelscited by 43
  6. 2020Differentially Private Synthetic Data: Applied Evaluations and Enhancementscited by 36
  7. 2019ProPublica's COMPAS Data Revisitedcited by 24
  8. 2021Reducing bias and increasing utility by federated generative modeling of medical images using a centralized adversarycited by 14
  9. 2020Google COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports: Anonymization Process Description (version 1.1)cited by 13
  10. 2022Evaluating the Fairness Impact of Differentially Private Synthetic Datacited by 9
  11. 2022Faking feature importance: A cautionary tale on the use of differentially-private synthetic datacited by 8
  12. 2023FFPDG: Fast, Fair and Private Data Generationcited by 8
  13. 2021DP-SGD vs PATE: Which Has Less Disparate Impact on GANs?cited by 7
  14. 2021An Analysis of the Deployment of Models Trained on Private Tabular Synthetic Data: Unexpected Surprisescited by 6
  15. 2021U.S. Broadband Coverage Data Set: A Differentially Private Data Releasecited by 5
  16. 2020Towards Auditability for Fairness in Deep Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

8 papers.