mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating the Fairness Impact of Differentially Private Synthetic Data

arXiv 2205.04321 ↗First posted 9 May 2022cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Differentially private (DP) synthetic data is a promising approach to maximizing the utility of data containing sensitive information. Due to the suppression of underrepresented classes that is often required to achieve privacy, however, it may be in conflict with fairness. We evaluate four DP synthesizers and present empirical results indicating that three of these models frequently degrade fairness outcomes on downstream binary classification tasks. We draw a connection between fairness and the proportion of minority groups present in the generated synthetic data, and find that training synthesizers on data that are pre-processed via a multi-label undersampling method can promote more fair outcomes without degrading accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2022.

Builds on

9 of 17 references.

References · 9

  1. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  2. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  3. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  4. 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 695
  5. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
  6. 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
  7. 2021Winning the NIST Contest: A scalable and general approach to differentially private synthetic datacited by 101
  8. 2019Graphical-model based estimation and inference for differential privacycited by 73
  9. 2020Differentially Private Synthetic Data: Applied Evaluations and Enhancementscited by 36

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

9 papers.