mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Using GPT-4 to Augment Unbalanced Data for Automatic Scoring

arXiv 2310.18365 ↗First posted 25 Oct 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning-based automatic scoring faces challenges with unbalanced student responses across scoring categories. To address this, we introduce a novel text data augmentation framework leveraging GPT-4, a generative large language model, specifically tailored for unbalanced datasets in automatic scoring. Our experimental dataset comprised student written responses to four science items. We crafted prompts for GPT-4 to generate responses, especially for minority scoring classes, enhancing the data set. We then finetuned DistillBERT for automatic scoring based on the augmented and original datasets. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 metrics. Our findings revealed that incorporating GPT-4-augmented data remarkedly improved model performance, particularly for precision and F1 scores. Interestingly, the extent of improvement varied depending on the specific dataset and the proportion of augmented data used. Notably, we found that a varying amount of augmented data (20%-40%) was needed to obtain stable improvement for automatic scoring. Comparisons with models trained on additional student-written responses suggest that GPT-4 augmented models match those trained with student data. This research underscores the potential and effectiveness of data augmentation techniques utilizing generative large language models like GPT-4 in addressing unbalanced datasets within automated assessment.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2023.

Builds on

22 of 57 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  3. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  4. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  5. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  6. 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,578
  7. 2015Aligning Books and Movies: Towards Story-like Visual Explanations by Watching Movies and Reading Bookscited by 1,041
  8. 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 800
  9. 2021A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLPcited by 408
  10. 2017Data Augmentation Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 278
  11. 2021GPT3Mix: Leveraging Large-scale Language Models for Text Augmentationcited by 185
  12. 2018QANet: Combining Local Convolution with Global Self-Attention for Reading Comprehensioncited by 164
10 more
  1. 2023AugGPT: Leveraging ChatGPT for Text Data Augmentationcited by 128
  2. 2019Augmenting Data with Mixup for Sentence Classification: An Empirical Studycited by 125
  3. 2021A Survey on Data Augmentation for Text Classificationcited by 111
  4. 2018Conditional BERT Contextual Augmentationcited by 107
  5. 2021Data Augmentation Approaches in Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 82
  6. 2020Data Boost: Text Data Augmentation Through Reinforcement Learning Guided Conditional Generationcited by 47
  7. 2019A Closer Look At Feature Space Data Augmentation For Few-Shot Intent Classificationcited by 45
  8. 2023ZeroShotDataAug: Generating and Augmenting Training Data with ChatGPTcited by 32
  9. 2023Matching Exemplar as Next Sentence Prediction (MeNSP): Zero-shot Prompt Learning for Automatic Scoring in Science Educationcited by 18
  10. 2022Pseudo AI Biascited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 9; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024LLM2LLM: Boosting LLMs with Novel Iterative Data Enhancementcited by 69
  2. 2023Applying Large Language Models and Chain-of-Thought for Automatic Scoringcited by 68
  3. 2024LLM Discussion: Enhancing the Creativity of Large Language Models via Discussion Framework and Role-Playcited by 65
  4. 2024TinyAgent: Function Calling at the Edgecited by 55
  5. 2024Effects of diversity incentives on sample diversity and downstream model performance in LLM-based text augmentationcited by 17
  6. 2023NERIF: GPT-4V for Automatic Scoring of Drawn Modelscited by 13
  7. 2023Gemini Pro Defeated by GPT-4V: Evidence from Educationcited by 12
  8. 2024LLMs vs Established Text Augmentation Techniques for Classification: When do the Benefits Outweight the Costs?cited by 8
  9. 2024Use Random Selection for Now: Investigation of Few-Shot Selection Strategies in LLM-based Text Augmentation for Classificationcited by 7
  10. 2024Realizing Visual Question Answering for Education: GPT-4V as a Multimodal AIcited by 5
  11. 2023Knowledge Distillation of LLM for Automatic Scoring of Science Education Assessmentscited by 4
  12. 2024AI and Machine Learning for Next Generation Science Assessmentscited by 3
8 more
  1. 2025A Rigorous Evaluation of LLM Data Generation Strategies for Low-Resource Languagescited by 2
  2. 2026Better as Generators Than Classifiers: Leveraging LLMs and Synthetic Data for Low-Resource Multilingual Classificationcited by 2
  3. 2025RoSE: Round-robin Synthetic Data Evaluation for Selecting LLM Generators without Human Test Setscited by 1
  4. 2024Optimizing Alignment with Less: Leveraging Data Augmentation for Personalized Evaluationcited by 0
  5. 2025Using Large Language Models to Assess Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledgecited by 0
  6. 2026KALE: Enhancing Knowledge Manipulation in Large Language Models via Knowledge-aware Learningcited by 0
  7. 2026Exploring Data Augmentation and Resampling Strategies for Transformer-Based Models to Address Class Imbalance in AI Scoring of Scientific Explanations in NGSS Classroomcited by 0
  8. 2026Want Better Synthetic Data? Steer It: Activation Steering for Low-Resource Language Generationcited by 0