mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Impressions: Understanding Visual Semiotics and Aesthetic Impact

arXiv 2310.17887 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Is aesthetic impact different from beauty? Is visual salience a reflection of its capacity for effective communication? We present Impressions, a novel dataset through which to investigate the semiotics of images, and how specific visual features and design choices can elicit specific emotions, thoughts and beliefs. We posit that the impactfulness of an image extends beyond formal definitions of aesthetics, to its success as a communicative act, where style contributes as much to meaning formation as the subject matter. However, prior image captioning datasets are not designed to empower state-of-the-art architectures to model potential human impressions or interpretations of images. To fill this gap, we design an annotation task heavily inspired by image analysis techniques in the Visual Arts to collect 1,440 image-caption pairs and 4,320 unique annotations exploring impact, pragmatic image description, impressions, and aesthetic design choices. We show that existing multimodal image captioning and conditional generation models struggle to simulate plausible human responses to images. However, this dataset significantly improves their ability to model impressions and aesthetic evaluations of images through fine-tuning and few-shot adaptation.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2023.

Builds on

31 of 73 references.

References · 31

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  3. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  4. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
  5. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,516
  6. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
  7. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
  8. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,462
  9. 2019OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledgecited by 1,121
  10. 2018From Recognition to Cognition: Visual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 556
  11. 2022GIT: A Generative Image-to-text Transformer for Vision and Languagecited by 537
  12. 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 402
19 more
  1. 2016Visual Dialogcited by 377
  2. 2021WIT: Wikipedia-based Image Text Dataset for Multimodal Multilingual Machine Learningcited by 287
  3. 2021ArtEmis: Affective Language for Visual Artcited by 104
  4. 2016Reasoning About Pragmatics with Neural Listeners and Speakerscited by 68
  5. 2018Engaging Image Captioning Via Personalitycited by 51
  6. 2019Natural Language Understanding with the Quora Question Pairs Datasetcited by 51
  7. 2020Natural Language Rationales with Full-Stack Visual Reasoning: From Pixels to Semantic Frames to Commonsense Graphscited by 46
  8. 2017Context-aware Captions from Context-agnostic Supervisioncited by 43
  9. 2018Contemplating Visual Emotions: Understanding and Overcoming Dataset Biascited by 41
  10. 2020A Dataset and Baselines for Visual Question Answering on Artcited by 38
  11. 2017Attend to You: Personalized Image Captioning with Context Sequence Memory Networkscited by 35
  12. 2023I Spy a Metaphor: Large Language Models and Diffusion Models Co-Create Visual Metaphorscited by 31
  13. 2022MetaCLUE: Towards Comprehensive Visual Metaphors Researchcited by 28
  14. 2016Stereotyping and Bias in the Flickr30K Datasetcited by 25
  15. 2022Needle in a Haystack: An Analysis of High-Agreement Workers on MTurk for Summarizationcited by 10
  16. 2021Similar Scenes arouse Similar Emotions: Parallel Data Augmentation for Stylized Image Captioningcited by 7
  17. 2023Evaluating Pragmatic Abilities of Image Captioners on A3DScited by 5
  18. 2016Pandora: Description of a Painting Database for Art Movement Recognition with Baselines and Perspectivescited by 4
  19. 2017Punny Captions: Witty Wordplay in Image Descriptionscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.