mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Needle in a Haystack: An Analysis of High-Agreement Workers on MTurk for Summarization

arXiv 2212.10397 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2022cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To prevent the costly and inefficient use of resources on low-quality annotations, we want a method for creating a pool of dependable annotators who can effectively complete difficult tasks, such as evaluating automatic summarization. Thus, we investigate the recruitment of high-quality Amazon Mechanical Turk workers via a two-step pipeline. We show that we can successfully filter out subpar workers before they carry out the evaluations and obtain high-agreement annotations with similar constraints on resources. Although our workers demonstrate a strong consensus among themselves and CloudResearch workers, their alignment with expert judgments on a subset of the data is not as expected and needs further training in correctness. This paper still serves as a best practice for the recruitment of qualified annotators in other challenging annotation tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2022.

Builds on

17 of 65 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  4. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
  5. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  6. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 674
  7. 2021The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metricscited by 239
  8. 2022Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Textcited by 155
  9. 2020With Little Power Comes Great Responsibilitycited by 142
  10. 2021The Perils of Using Mechanical Turk to Evaluate Open-Ended Text Generationcited by 97
  11. 2019HighRES: Highlight-based Reference-less Evaluation of Summarizationcited by 21
  12. 2021The Human Evaluation Datasheet 1.0: A Template for Recording Details of Human Evaluation Experiments in NLPcited by 19
5 more
  1. 2021A Survey of NLP-Related Crowdsourcing HITs: what works and what does notcited by 15
  2. 2020A Human Evaluation of AMR-to-English Generation Systemscited by 13
  3. 2021Quantifying and Avoiding Unfair Qualification Labour in Crowdsourcingcited by 11
  4. 2017Evaluation of Automatic Video Captioning Using Direct Assessmentcited by 7
  5. 2020Creativity on Paid Crowdsourcing Platformscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 2.

10 papers.