CATE Lasso: Conditional Average Treatment Effect Estimation with High-Dimensional Linear Regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In causal inference about two treatments, Conditional Average Treatment Effects (CATEs) play an important role as a quantity representing an individualized causal effect, defined as a difference between the expected outcomes of the two treatments conditioned on covariates. This study assumes two linear regression models between a potential outcome and covariates of the two treatments and defines CATEs as a difference between the linear regression models. Then, we propose a method for consistently estimating CATEs even under high-dimensional and non-sparse parameters. In our study, we demonstrate that desirable theoretical properties, such as consistency, remain attainable even without assuming sparsity explicitly if we assume a weaker assumption called implicit sparsity originating from the definition of CATEs. In this assumption, we suppose that parameters of linear models in potential outcomes can be divided into treatment-specific and common parameters, where the treatment-specific parameters take difference values between each linear regression model, while the common parameters remain identical. Thus, in a difference between two linear regression models, the common parameters disappear, leaving only differences in the treatment-specific parameters. Consequently, the non-zero parameters in CATEs correspond to the differences in the treatment-specific parameters. Leveraging this assumption, we develop a Lasso regression method specialized for CATE estimation and present that the estimator is consistent. Finally, we confirm the soundness of the proposed method by simulation studies.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2023.
Builds on
21 of 77 references.
References · 21
- 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 598
- 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 545
- 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 477
- 2017Nonparametric regression using deep neural networks with ReLU activation functioncited by 432
- 2017Quasi-Oracle Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effectscited by 330
- 2016Learning Representations for Counterfactual Inferencecited by 327
- 2016Generalized Random Forestscited by 310
- 2019Adapting Neural Networks for the Estimation of Treatment Effectscited by 285
- 2017Bayesian Inference of Individualized Treatment Effects using Multi-task Gaussian Processescited by 156
- 2021Nonparametric Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: From Theory to Learning Algorithmscited by 144
- 2013Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing for High-Dimensional Regressioncited by 79
- 2020Open Bandit Dataset and Pipeline: Towards Realistic and Reproducible Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 77
9 more
- 2021Discussion on "Bayesian Regression Tree Models for Causal Inference: Regularization, Confounding, and Heterogeneous Effects" by Hahn, Murray and Carvalhocited by 77
- 2021On Inductive Biases for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 74
- 2017Some methods for heterogeneous treatment effect estimation in high-dimensionscited by 48
- 2016Covariate Balancing Propensity Score by Tailored Loss Functionscited by 34
- 2016Recursive Partitioning for Personalization using Observational Datacited by 28
- 2013Uniform Post Selection Inference for LAD Regression and Other Z-estimation problemscited by 11
- 2013Post-Selection Inference for Generalized Linear Models with Many Controlscited by 11
- 2016Semi-parametric efficiency bounds for high-dimensional modelscited by 5
- 2020A Tree-based Semi-Varying Coefficient Model for the COM-Poisson Distributioncited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.