mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PROMINET: Prototype-based Multi-View Network for Interpretable Email Response Prediction

arXiv 2310.16753 ↗First posted 25 Oct 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Email is a widely used tool for business communication, and email marketing has emerged as a cost-effective strategy for enterprises. While previous studies have examined factors affecting email marketing performance, limited research has focused on understanding email response behavior by considering email content and metadata. This study proposes a Prototype-based Multi-view Network (PROMINET) that incorporates semantic and structural information from email data. By utilizing prototype learning, the PROMINET model generates latent exemplars, enabling interpretable email response prediction. The model maps learned semantic and structural exemplars to observed samples in the training data at different levels of granularity, such as document, sentence, or phrase. The approach is evaluated on two real-world email datasets: the Enron corpus and an in-house Email Marketing corpus. Experimental results demonstrate that the PROMINET model outperforms baseline models, achieving a ~3% improvement in F1 score on both datasets. Additionally, the model provides interpretability through prototypes at different granularity levels while maintaining comparable performance to non-interpretable models. The learned prototypes also show potential for generating suggestions to enhance email text editing and improve the likelihood of effective email responses. This research contributes to enhancing sender-receiver communication and customer engagement in email interactions.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2023.

Builds on

18 of 36 references.

References · 18

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  4. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  5. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
  6. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  7. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
  8. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  9. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  10. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 737
  11. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  12. 2018Graph Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 345
6 more
  1. 2021Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Surveycited by 156
  2. 2019Interpretable and Steerable Sequence Learning via Prototypescited by 72
  3. 2021SelfExplain: A Self-Explaining Architecture for Neural Text Classifierscited by 44
  4. 2016Explaining Predictions of Non-Linear Classifiers in NLPcited by 37
  5. 2020Self-Explaining Structures Improve NLP Modelscited by 22
  6. 2015Evolution of Conversations in the Age of Email Overloadcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.