mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Self-Explaining Structures Improve NLP Models

arXiv 2012.01786 ↗First posted 3 Dec 2020cs.CLcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing approaches to explaining deep learning models in NLP usually suffer from two major drawbacks: (1) the main model and the explaining model are decoupled: an additional probing or surrogate model is used to interpret an existing model, and thus existing explaining tools are not self-explainable; (2) the probing model is only able to explain a model's predictions by operating on low-level features by computing saliency scores for individual words but are clumsy at high-level text units such as phrases, sentences, or paragraphs. To deal with these two issues, in this paper, we propose a simple yet general and effective self-explaining framework for deep learning models in NLP. The key point of the proposed framework is to put an additional layer, as is called by the interpretation layer, on top of any existing NLP model. This layer aggregates the information for each text span, which is then associated with a specific weight, and their weighted combination is fed to the softmax function for the final prediction. The proposed model comes with the following merits: (1) span weights make the model self-explainable and do not require an additional probing model for interpretation; (2) the proposed model is general and can be adapted to any existing deep learning structures in NLP; (3) the weight associated with each text span provides direct importance scores for higher-level text units such as phrases and sentences. We for the first time show that interpretability does not come at the cost of performance: a neural model of self-explaining features obtains better performances than its counterpart without the self-explaining nature, achieving a new SOTA performance of 59.1 on SST-5 and a new SOTA performance of 92.3 on SNLI.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Supervising Model Attention with Human Explanations for Robust Natural Language Inferencecited by 29
  2. 2021Interpreting Deep Learning Models in Natural Language Processing: A Reviewcited by 19
  3. 2023An Overview Of Temporal Commonsense Reasoning and Acquisitioncited by 10
  4. 2023Proto-lm: A Prototypical Network-Based Framework for Built-in Interpretability in Large Language Modelscited by 7
  5. 2021Lexicon-based Methods vs. BERT for Text Sentiment Analysiscited by 4
  6. 2025FinNLI: Novel Dataset for Multi-Genre Financial Natural Language Inference Benchmarkingcited by 3
  7. 2022YATO: Yet Another deep learning based Text analysis Open toolkitcited by 2
  8. 2023PROMINET: Prototype-based Multi-View Network for Interpretable Email Response Predictioncited by 2
  9. 2024Temporal Validity Change Predictioncited by 2
  10. 2024Combining Denoising Autoencoders with Contrastive Learning to fine-tune Transformer Modelscited by 2
  11. 2024Enhancing adversarial robustness in Natural Language Inference using explanationscited by 2
  12. 2025MorphNLI: A Stepwise Approach to Natural Language Inference Using Text Morphingcited by 2
10 more
  1. 2022CNN-Trans-Enc: A CNN-Enhanced Transformer-Encoder On Top Of Static BERT representations for Document Classificationcited by 1
  2. 2022Towards Linguistically Informed Multi-Objective Pre-Training for Natural Language Inferencecited by 1
  3. 2025Fine-tuning BERT with Bidirectional LSTM for Fine-grained Movie Reviews Sentiment Analysiscited by 1
  4. 2025From Text to Graph: Leveraging Graph Neural Networks for Enhanced Explainability in NLPcited by 1
  5. 2021Current Landscape of the Russian Sentiment Corporacited by 0
  6. 2021Humanly Certifying Superhuman Classifierscited by 0
  7. 2023Examining the Emergence of Deductive Reasoning in Generative Language Modelscited by 0
  8. 2024EntailE: Introducing Textual Entailment in Commonsense Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 0
  9. 2026Reverse-engineering NLI: A study of the meta-inferential properties of Natural Language Inferencecited by 0
  10. 2026The Association of Transformer-based Sentiment Analysis with Symptom Distress and Deterioration in Routine Psychotherapy Carecited by 0