Robust and Actively Secure Serverless Collaborative Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Collaborative machine learning (ML) is widely used to enable institutions to learn better models from distributed data. While collaborative approaches to learning intuitively protect user data, they remain vulnerable to either the server, the clients, or both, deviating from the protocol. Indeed, because the protocol is asymmetric, a malicious server can abuse its power to reconstruct client data points. Conversely, malicious clients can corrupt learning with malicious updates. Thus, both clients and servers require a guarantee when the other cannot be trusted to fully cooperate. In this work, we propose a peer-to-peer (P2P) learning scheme that is secure against malicious servers and robust to malicious clients. Our core contribution is a generic framework that transforms any (compatible) algorithm for robust aggregation of model updates to the setting where servers and clients can act maliciously. Finally, we demonstrate the computational efficiency of our approach even with 1-million parameter models trained by 100s of peers on standard datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2023.
Builds on
31 of 52 references.
References · 31
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
- 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 382
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 346
- 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 329
- 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 326
- 2019Robust Aggregation for Federated Learningcited by 317
19 more
- 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 288
- 2018Beyond Inferring Class Representatives: User-Level Privacy Leakage From Federated Learningcited by 246
- 2018RSA: Byzantine-Robust Stochastic Aggregation Methods for Distributed Learning from Heterogeneous Datasetscited by 149
- 2019Fall of Empires: Breaking Byzantine-tolerant SGD by Inner Product Manipulationcited by 141
- 2020Learning from History for Byzantine Robust Optimizationcited by 137
- 2020Byzantine-Robust Learning on Heterogeneous Datasets via Bucketingcited by 128
- 2021The Distributed Discrete Gaussian Mechanism for Federated Learning with Secure Aggregationcited by 128
- 2021When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Privatecited by 127
- 2018Generalized Byzantine-tolerant SGDcited by 95
- 2023Federated Learning of Gboard Language Models with Differential Privacycited by 66
- 2023(Amplified) Banded Matrix Factorization: A unified approach to private trainingcited by 49
- 2022Multi-Epoch Matrix Factorization Mechanisms for Private Machine Learningcited by 48
- 2022The Fundamental Price of Secure Aggregation in Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 39
- 2021CaPC Learning: Confidential and Private Collaborative Learningcited by 33
- 2021EIFFeL: Ensuring Integrity for Federated Learningcited by 28
- 2019Robust Learning from Untrusted Sourcescited by 27
- 2018Biscotti: A Ledger for Private and Secure Peer-to-Peer Machine Learningcited by 17
- 2014Distributed Robust Learningcited by 13
- 2023Private Federated Learning with Autotuned Compressioncited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.