mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Local Universal Explainer (LUX) -- a rule-based explainer with factual, counterfactual and visual explanations

arXiv 2310.14894 ↗First posted 23 Oct 2023cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) is one of the most intensively developed area of AI in recent years. It is also one of the most fragmented with multiple methods that focus on different aspects of explanations. This makes difficult to obtain the full spectrum of explanation at once in a compact and consistent way. To address this issue, we present Local Universal Explainer (LUX), which is a rule-based explainer that can generate factual, counterfactual and visual explanations. It is based on a modified version of decision tree algorithms that allows for oblique splits and integration with feature importance XAI methods such as SHAP. It limits the use data generation in opposite to other algorithms, but is focused on selecting local concepts in a form of high-density clusters of real data that have the highest impact on forming the decision boundary of the explained model and generating artificial samples with novel SHAP-guided sampling algorithm. We tested our method on real and synthetic datasets and compared it with state-of-the-art rule-based explainers such as LORE, EXPLAN and Anchor. Our method outperforms the existing approaches in terms of simplicity, fidelity, representativeness, and consistency.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2023.

Builds on

18 of 58 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  5. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
  6. 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 343
  7. 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 327
  8. 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 279
  9. 2016Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 219
  10. 2018Local Rule-Based Explanations of Black Box Decision Systemscited by 165
  11. 2021CARLA: A Python Library to Benchmark Algorithmic Recourse and Counterfactual Explanation Algorithmscited by 85
  12. 2020General Pitfalls of Model-Agnostic Interpretation Methods for Machine Learning Modelscited by 74
6 more
  1. 2021Explainability Pitfalls: Beyond Dark Patterns in Explainable AIcited by 36
  2. 2023An Empirical Evaluation of the Rashomon Effect in Explainable Machine Learningcited by 25
  3. 2020The Grammar of Interactive Explanatory Model Analysiscited by 24
  4. 2022s-LIME: Reconciling Locality and Fidelity in Linear Explanationscited by 8
  5. 2021Pitfalls of Explainable ML: An Industry Perspectivecited by 3
  6. 2021KnAC: an approach for enhancing cluster analysis with background knowledge and explanationscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.