s-LIME: Reconciling Locality and Fidelity in Linear Explanations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The benefit of locality is one of the major premises of LIME, one of the most prominent methods to explain black-box machine learning models. This emphasis relies on the postulate that the more locally we look at the vicinity of an instance, the simpler the black-box model becomes, and the more accurately we can mimic it with a linear surrogate. As logical as this seems, our findings suggest that, with the current design of LIME, the surrogate model may degenerate when the explanation is too local, namely, when the bandwidth parameter σ tends to zero. Based on this observation, the contribution of this paper is twofold. Firstly, we study the impact of both the bandwidth and the training vicinity on the fidelity and semantics of LIME explanations. Secondly, and based on our findings, we propose slime, an extension of LIME that reconciles fidelity and locality.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2022.
Builds on
12 of 23 references.
References · 12
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2016Time Series Classification from Scratch with Deep Neural Networks: A Strong Baselinecited by 358
- 2021Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Modelscited by 136
- 2020Explaining the Explainer: A First Theoretical Analysis of LIMEcited by 89
- 2019DLIME: A Deterministic Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations Approach for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systemscited by 59
- 2019ALIME: Autoencoder Based Approach for Local Interpretabilitycited by 41
- 2020OptiLIME: Optimized LIME Explanations for Diagnostic Computer Algorithmscited by 30
- 2021To trust or not to trust an explanation: using LEAF to evaluate local linear XAI methodscited by 26
- 2019The Bouncer Problem: Challenges to Remote Explainabilitycited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
8 papers.
- 2023Shaping Up SHAP: Enhancing Stability through Layer-Wise Neighbor Selectioncited by 7
- 2025Which LIME should I trust? Concepts, Challenges, and Solutionscited by 7
- 2023SurvBeX: An explanation method of the machine learning survival models based on the Beran estimatorcited by 3
- 2024Developing Guidelines for Functionally-Grounded Evaluation of Explainable Artificial Intelligence using Tabular Datacited by 2
- 2024Axiomatic Explainer Globalness via Optimal Transportcited by 2
- 2023Local Universal Explainer (LUX) -- a rule-based explainer with factual, counterfactual and visual explanationscited by 1
- 2023"Honey, Tell Me What's Wrong", Global Explanation of Textual Discriminative Models through Cooperative Generationcited by 0
- 2023SurvBeNIM: The Beran-Based Neural Importance Model for Explaining the Survival Modelscited by 0
- 2025Which LIME should I trust? Concepts, Challenges, and Solutions31 Mar 2025
- 2024Axiomatic Explainer Globalness via Optimal Transport2 Nov 2024
- 2024Developing Guidelines for Functionally-Grounded Evaluation of Explainable Artificial Intelligence using Tabular Data30 Sep 2024
- 2023Shaping Up SHAP: Enhancing Stability through Layer-Wise Neighbor Selection19 Dec 2023
- 2023SurvBeNIM: The Beran-Based Neural Importance Model for Explaining the Survival Models11 Dec 2023
- 2023"Honey, Tell Me What's Wrong", Global Explanation of Textual Discriminative Models through Cooperative Generation27 Oct 2023
- 2023Local Universal Explainer (LUX) -- a rule-based explainer with factual, counterfactual and visual explanations23 Oct 2023
- 2023SurvBeX: An explanation method of the machine learning survival models based on the Beran estimator7 Aug 2023