mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Non-autoregressive Streaming Transformer for Simultaneous Translation

arXiv 2310.14883 ↗First posted 23 Oct 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Simultaneous machine translation (SiMT) models are trained to strike a balance between latency and translation quality. However, training these models to achieve high quality while maintaining low latency often leads to a tendency for aggressive anticipation. We argue that such issue stems from the autoregressive architecture upon which most existing SiMT models are built. To address those issues, we propose non-autoregressive streaming Transformer (NAST) which comprises a unidirectional encoder and a non-autoregressive decoder with intra-chunk parallelism. We enable NAST to generate the blank token or repetitive tokens to adjust its READ/WRITE strategy flexibly, and train it to maximize the non-monotonic latent alignment with an alignment-based latency loss. Experiments on various SiMT benchmarks demonstrate that NAST outperforms previous strong autoregressive SiMT baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2023.

Builds on

30 of 36 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  4. 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 761
  5. 2020FastSpeech 2: Fast and High-Quality End-to-End Text to Speechcited by 710
  6. 2017Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 457
  7. 2018Learning Latent Permutations with Gumbel-Sinkhorn Networkscited by 172
  8. 2019Monotonic Infinite Lookback Attention for Simultaneous Machine Translationcited by 103
  9. 2020Glancing Transformer for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 103
  10. 2016Learning to Translate in Real-time with Neural Machine Translationcited by 97
  11. 2019Monotonic Multihead Attentioncited by 91
  12. 2016Can neural machine translation do simultaneous translation?cited by 85
18 more
  1. 2017Online and Linear-Time Attention by Enforcing Monotonic Alignmentscited by 85
  2. 2018End-to-End Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation with Connectionist Temporal Classificationcited by 72
  3. 2020Aligned Cross Entropy for Non-Autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 65
  4. 2020Efficient Wait-k Models for Simultaneous Machine Translationcited by 59
  5. 2021Order-Agnostic Cross Entropy for Non-Autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 57
  6. 2022Directed Acyclic Transformer for Non-Autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 44
  7. 2020Simultaneous Translation Policies: From Fixed to Adaptivecited by 42
  8. 2019Minimizing the Bag-of-Ngrams Difference for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 40
  9. 2021Universal Simultaneous Machine Translation with Mixture-of-Experts Wait-k Policycited by 32
  10. 2023Hidden Markov Transformer for Simultaneous Machine Translationcited by 24
  11. 2020Improving Simultaneous Translation by Incorporating Pseudo-References with Fewer Reorderingscited by 20
  12. 2021Sequence-Level Training for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 18
  13. 2022Non-Monotonic Latent Alignments for CTC-Based Non-Autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 16
  14. 2022Viterbi Decoding of Directed Acyclic Transformer for Non-Autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 13
  15. 2023Fuzzy Alignments in Directed Acyclic Graph for Non-Autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 11
  16. 2023CTC-based Non-autoregressive Speech Translationcited by 9
  17. 2023DASpeech: Directed Acyclic Transformer for Fast and High-quality Speech-to-Speech Translationcited by 9
  18. 2022Anticipation-Free Training for Simultaneous Machine Translationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 8; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

12 papers.