Dynamically Weighted Federated k-Means
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated clustering, an integral aspect of federated machine learning, enables multiple data sources to collaboratively cluster their data, maintaining decentralization and preserving privacy. In this paper, we introduce a novel federated clustering algorithm named Dynamically Weighted Federated k-means (DWF k-means) based on Lloyd's method for k-means clustering, to address the challenges associated with distributed data sources and heterogeneous data. Our proposed algorithm combines the benefits of traditional clustering techniques with the privacy and scalability benefits offered by federated learning. The algorithm facilitates collaborative clustering among multiple data owners, allowing them to cluster their local data collectively while exchanging minimal information with the central coordinator. The algorithm optimizes the clustering process by adaptively aggregating cluster assignments and centroids from each data source, thereby learning a global clustering solution that reflects the collective knowledge of the entire federated network. We address the issue of empty clusters, which commonly arises in the context of federated clustering. We conduct experiments on multiple datasets and data distribution settings to evaluate the performance of our algorithm in terms of clustering score, accuracy, and v-measure. The results demonstrate that our approach can match the performance of the centralized classical k-means baseline, and outperform existing federated clustering methods like k-FED in realistic scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2023.
Builds on
27 of 63 references.
References · 27
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
- 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 792
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 536
- 2020An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated Learningcited by 511
- 2019Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraintscited by 503
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 321
- 2020Attack of the Tails: Yes, You Really Can Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 309
- 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 272
- 2019Can You Really Backdoor Federated Learning?cited by 255
15 more
- 2018Beyond Inferring Class Representatives: User-Level Privacy Leakage From Federated Learningcited by 246
- 2020Federated learning with hierarchical clustering of local updates to improve training on non-IID datacited by 223
- 2018Applied Federated Learning: Improving Google Keyboard Query Suggestionscited by 204
- 2020A Survey of Privacy Attacks in Machine Learningcited by 146
- 2017Revisiting Distributed Synchronous SGDcited by 142
- 2018Federated Learning for Keyword Spottingcited by 95
- 2019Robust Federated Learning in a Heterogeneous Environmentcited by 90
- 2021Heterogeneity for the Win: One-Shot Federated Clusteringcited by 87
- 2018Privacy Preserving Machine Learning: Threats and Solutionscited by 79
- 2019Federated Learning Of Out-Of-Vocabulary Wordscited by 51
- 2022Towards Federated Clustering: A Federated Fuzzy c-Means Algorithm (FFCM)cited by 30
- 2020Dynamic Clustering in Federated Learningcited by 27
- 2022Differentially Private Vertical Federated Clusteringcited by 10
- 2023Federated K-means Clusteringcited by 9
- 2020Federated Matrix Factorization: Algorithm Design and Application to Data Clusteringcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.