Differentially Private Vertical Federated Clustering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In many applications, multiple parties have private data regarding the same set of users but on disjoint sets of attributes, and a server wants to leverage the data to train a model. To enable model learning while protecting the privacy of the data subjects, we need vertical federated learning (VFL) techniques, where the data parties share only information for training the model, instead of the private data. However, it is challenging to ensure that the shared information maintains privacy while learning accurate models. To the best of our knowledge, the algorithm proposed in this paper is the first practical solution for differentially private vertical federated k-means clustering, where the server can obtain a set of global centers with a provable differential privacy guarantee. Our algorithm assumes an untrusted central server that aggregates differentially private local centers and membership encodings from local data parties. It builds a weighted grid as the synopsis of the global dataset based on the received information. Final centers are generated by running any k-means algorithm on the weighted grid. Our approach for grid weight estimation uses a novel, light-weight, and differentially private set intersection cardinality estimation algorithm based on the Flajolet-Martin sketch. To improve the estimation accuracy in the setting with more than two data parties, we further propose a refined version of the weights estimation algorithm and a parameter tuning strategy to reduce the final k-means utility to be close to that in the central private setting. We provide theoretical utility analysis and experimental evaluation results for the cluster centers computed by our algorithm and show that our approach performs better both theoretically and empirically than the two baselines based on existing techniques.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2022.
Builds on
27 of 81 references.
References · 27
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 528
- 2018Distributed learning of deep neural network over multiple agentscited by 277
- 2019The Secret Revealer: Generative Model-Inversion Attacks Against Deep Neural Networkscited by 241
- 2020Privacy Preserving Vertical Federated Learning for Tree-based Modelscited by 89
- 2020VAFL: a Method of Vertical Asynchronous Federated Learningcited by 87
- 2016Better Guarantees for k-Means and Euclidean k-Median by Primal-Dual Algorithmscited by 54
15 more
- 2019Federated Forestcited by 49
- 2020Federated Doubly Stochastic Kernel Learning for Vertically Partitioned Datacited by 35
- 2020Differentially Private Clustering: Tight Approximation Ratioscited by 34
- 2015Differentially Private k-Means Clusteringcited by 27
- 2019The Value of Collaboration in Convex Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 24
- 2018Differentially Private k-Means with Constant Multiplicative Errorcited by 22
- 2020Hybrid Differentially Private Federated Learning on Vertically Partitioned Datacited by 22
- 2016Locating a Small Cluster Privatelycited by 20
- 2021Locally Private k-Means in One Roundcited by 19
- 2017Clustering Algorithms for the Centralized and Local Modelscited by 18
- 2019Learning Privately over Distributed Features: An ADMM Sharing Approachcited by 14
- 2022Improving Privacy-Preserving Vertical Federated Learning by Efficient Communication with ADMMcited by 10
- 2017Back to the Future: an Even More Nearly Optimal Cardinality Estimation Algorithmcited by 2
- 2018Cardinality Estimators do not Preserve Privacycited by 2
- 2020Efficient Differentially Private F0 Linear Sketchingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2022Vertical Federated Learning: Concepts, Advances and Challengescited by 104
- 2023A Survey for Federated Learning Evaluations: Goals and Measurescited by 16
- 2024Cross-silo Federated Learning with Record-level Personalized Differential Privacycited by 7
- 2024A Survey of Privacy Threats and Defense in Vertical Federated Learning: From Model Life Cycle Perspectivecited by 7
- 2023Private Learning with Public Featurescited by 6
- 2024FastLloyd: Federated, Accurate, Secure, and Tunable k-Means Clustering with Differential Privacycited by 2
- 2023Dynamically Weighted Federated k-Meanscited by 1
- 2024Just a Simple Transformation is Enough for Data Protection in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 1
- 2025PBM-VFL: Vertical Federated Learning with Feature and Sample Privacycited by 0
- 2026VertCoHiRF: Decentralized Vertical Clustering Beyond k-meanscited by 0
- 2026VertCoHiRF: Decentralized Vertical Clustering Beyond k-means7 Feb 2026
- 2025PBM-VFL: Vertical Federated Learning with Feature and Sample Privacy23 Jan 2025
- 2024Just a Simple Transformation is Enough for Data Protection in Vertical Federated Learning16 Dec 2024
- 2024FastLloyd: Federated, Accurate, Secure, and Tunable k-Means Clustering with Differential Privacy3 May 2024
- 2024A Survey of Privacy Threats and Defense in Vertical Federated Learning: From Model Life Cycle Perspective6 Feb 2024
- 2024Cross-silo Federated Learning with Record-level Personalized Differential Privacy29 Jan 2024
- 2023Private Learning with Public Features24 Oct 2023
- 2023Dynamically Weighted Federated k-Means23 Oct 2023
- 2023A Survey for Federated Learning Evaluations: Goals and Measures23 Aug 2023
- 2022Vertical Federated Learning: Concepts, Advances and Challenges23 Nov 2022