mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Interpreting Indirect Answers to Yes-No Questions in Multiple Languages

arXiv 2310.13290 ↗First posted 20 Oct 2023cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Yes-no questions expect a yes or no for an answer, but people often skip polar keywords. Instead, they answer with long explanations that must be interpreted. In this paper, we focus on this challenging problem and release new benchmarks in eight languages. We present a distant supervision approach to collect training data. We also demonstrate that direct answers (i.e., with polar keywords) are useful to train models to interpret indirect answers (i.e., without polar keywords). Experimental results demonstrate that monolingual fine-tuning is beneficial if training data can be obtained via distant supervision for the language of interest (5 languages). Additionally, we show that cross-lingual fine-tuning is always beneficial (8 languages).

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2023.

Builds on

31 of 57 references.

References · 31

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  4. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  5. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
  6. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  7. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  8. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
  9. 2018CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challengecited by 683
  10. 2019On the Cross-lingual Transferability of Monolingual Representationscited by 578
  11. 2022Language Models are Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasonerscited by 530
  12. 2018QuAC : Question Answering in Contextcited by 381
19 more
  1. 2014Recurrent Models of Visual Attentioncited by 349
  2. 2019MLQA: Evaluating Cross-lingual Extractive Question Answeringcited by 340
  3. 2021Do Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of their Prompts?cited by 326
  4. 2021Reframing Instructional Prompts to GPTk's Languagecited by 176
  5. 2021BanglaBERT: Language Model Pretraining and Benchmarks for Low-Resource Language Understanding Evaluation in Banglacited by 125
  6. 2020A Large-Scale Chinese Short-Text Conversation Datasetcited by 77
  7. 2021XLM-E: Cross-lingual Language Model Pre-training via ELECTRAcited by 72
  8. 2019WIQA: A dataset for "What if..." reasoning over procedural textcited by 71
  9. 2020I like fish, especially dolphins: Addressing Contradictions in Dialogue Modelingcited by 68
  10. 2020Synthetic Data Augmentation for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Question Answeringcited by 41
  11. 2021Improving Pretrained Cross-Lingual Language Models via Self-Labeled Word Alignmentcited by 41
  12. 2021Consistency Regularization for Cross-Lingual Fine-Tuningcited by 41
  13. 2023Revisiting Machine Translation for Cross-lingual Classificationcited by 41
  14. 2020"I'd rather just go to bed": Understanding Indirect Answerscited by 36
  15. 2019Automatic Spanish Translation of the SQuAD Dataset for Multilingual Question Answeringcited by 35
  16. 2021NaturalConv: A Chinese Dialogue Dataset Towards Multi-turn Topic-driven Conversationcited by 35
  17. 2021MFAQ: a Multilingual FAQ Datasetcited by 17
  18. 2019Towards Realistic Practices In Low-Resource Natural Language Processing: The Development Setcited by 16
  19. 2017Cross-language Learning with Adversarial Neural Networks: Application to Community Question Answeringcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.