A Hyperparameter Study for Quantum Kernel Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantum kernel methods are a promising method in quantum machine learning thanks to the guarantees connected to them. Their accessibility for analytic considerations also opens up the possibility of prescreening datasets based on their potential for a quantum advantage. To do so, earlier works developed the geometric difference, which can be understood as a closeness measure between two kernel-based machine learning approaches, most importantly between a quantum kernel and a classical kernel. This metric links the quantum and classical model complexities, and it was developed to bound generalization error. Therefore, it raises the question of how this metric behaves in an empirical setting. In this work, we investigate the effects of hyperparameter choice on the model performance and the generalization gap between classical and quantum kernels. The importance of hyperparameters is well known also for classical machine learning. Of special interest are hyperparameters associated with the quantum Hamiltonian evolution feature map, as well as the number of qubits to trace out before computing a projected quantum kernel. We conduct a thorough investigation of the hyperparameters across 11 datasets and we identify certain aspects that can be exploited. Analyzing the effects of certain hyperparameter settings on the empirical performance, as measured by cross validation accuracy, and generalization ability, as measured by geometric difference described above, brings us one step closer to understanding the potential of quantum kernel methods on classical datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2023.
Builds on
15 of 44 references.
References · 15
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 630
- 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 622
- 2020The power of quantum neural networkscited by 379
- 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 338
- 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 333
- 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 200
- 2017OpenML Benchmarking Suitescited by 178
- 2016Toward Deeper Understanding of Neural Networks: The Power of Initialization and a Dual View on Expressivitycited by 138
- 2016Why does deep and cheap learning work so well?cited by 100
- 2021The Inductive Bias of Quantum Kernelscited by 91
- 2019The Born Supremacy: Quantum Advantage and Training of an Ising Born Machinecited by 76
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.
9 papers.
- 2024Quantum Kernel Methods under Scrutiny: A Benchmarking Studycited by 22
- 2023Quantum Neural Networks under Depolarization Noise: Exploring White-Box Attacks and Defensescited by 5
- 2025On the similarity of bandwidth-tuned quantum kernels and classical kernelscited by 3
- 2026Non-variational supervised quantum kernel methods: a reviewcited by 2
- 2026Quantum Circuit-Based Learning Models: Bridging Quantum Computing and Machine Learningcited by 1
- 2026Quantum Kernels for Audio Deepfake Detection Using Spectrogram Patch Featurescited by 1
- 2025Is data-efficient learning feasible with quantum models?cited by 0
- 2025Maritime object classification with SAR imagery using quantum kernel methodscited by 0
- 2026Benchmarking Quantum Machine Learning for Power-System Attack Detection: Evaluation Choices Decide the Outcome Before the Models Docited by 0
- 2026Benchmarking Quantum Machine Learning for Power-System Attack Detection: Evaluation Choices Decide the Outcome Before the Models Do16 Aug 2026
- 2026Quantum Kernels for Audio Deepfake Detection Using Spectrogram Patch Features7 May 2026
- 2026Non-variational supervised quantum kernel methods: a review9 Apr 2026
- 2026Quantum Circuit-Based Learning Models: Bridging Quantum Computing and Machine Learning19 Jan 2026
- 2025Maritime object classification with SAR imagery using quantum kernel methods12 Dec 2025
- 2025Is data-efficient learning feasible with quantum models?26 Aug 2025
- 2025On the similarity of bandwidth-tuned quantum kernels and classical kernels7 Mar 2025
- 2024Quantum Kernel Methods under Scrutiny: A Benchmarking Study6 Sep 2024
- 2023Quantum Neural Networks under Depolarization Noise: Exploring White-Box Attacks and Defenses29 Nov 2023