mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Hyperparameter Study for Quantum Kernel Methods

arXiv 2310.11891 ↗First posted 18 Oct 2023quant-ph cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Quantum kernel methods are a promising method in quantum machine learning thanks to the guarantees connected to them. Their accessibility for analytic considerations also opens up the possibility of prescreening datasets based on their potential for a quantum advantage. To do so, earlier works developed the geometric difference, which can be understood as a closeness measure between two kernel-based machine learning approaches, most importantly between a quantum kernel and a classical kernel. This metric links the quantum and classical model complexities, and it was developed to bound generalization error. Therefore, it raises the question of how this metric behaves in an empirical setting. In this work, we investigate the effects of hyperparameter choice on the model performance and the generalization gap between classical and quantum kernels. The importance of hyperparameters is well known also for classical machine learning. Of special interest are hyperparameters associated with the quantum Hamiltonian evolution feature map, as well as the number of qubits to trace out before computing a projected quantum kernel. We conduct a thorough investigation of the hyperparameters across 11 datasets and we identify certain aspects that can be exploited. Analyzing the effects of certain hyperparameter settings on the empirical performance, as measured by cross validation accuracy, and generalization ability, as measured by geometric difference described above, brings us one step closer to understanding the potential of quantum kernel methods on classical datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2023.

Builds on

15 of 44 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  2. 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 630
  3. 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 622
  4. 2020The power of quantum neural networkscited by 379
  5. 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 338
  6. 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 333
  7. 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 200
  8. 2017OpenML Benchmarking Suitescited by 178
  9. 2016Toward Deeper Understanding of Neural Networks: The Power of Initialization and a Dual View on Expressivitycited by 138
  10. 2016Why does deep and cheap learning work so well?cited by 100
  11. 2021The Inductive Bias of Quantum Kernelscited by 91
  12. 2019The Born Supremacy: Quantum Advantage and Training of an Ising Born Machinecited by 76
3 more
  1. 2021Importance of Kernel Bandwidth in Quantum Machine Learningcited by 31
  2. 2022Numerical evidence against advantage with quantum fidelity kernels on classical datacited by 11
  3. 2022Hyperparameter Importance of Quantum Neural Networks Across Small Datasetscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

9 papers.