mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Importance of Kernel Bandwidth in Quantum Machine Learning

arXiv 2111.05451 ↗First posted 9 Nov 2021quant-ph cs.LGcited by 31

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Quantum kernel methods are considered a promising avenue for applying quantum computers to machine learning problems. Identifying hyperparameters controlling the inductive bias of quantum machine learning models is expected to be crucial given the central role hyperparameters play in determining the performance of classical machine learning methods. In this work we introduce the hyperparameter controlling the bandwidth of a quantum kernel and show that it controls the expressivity of the resulting model. We use extensive numerical experiments with multiple quantum kernels and classical datasets to show consistent change in the model behavior from underfitting (bandwidth too large) to overfitting (bandwidth too small), with optimal generalization in between. We draw a connection between the bandwidth of classical and quantum kernels and show analogous behavior in both cases. Furthermore, we show that optimizing the bandwidth can help mitigate the exponential decay of kernel values with qubit count, which is the cause behind recent observations that the performance of quantum kernel methods decreases with qubit count. We reproduce these negative results and show that if the kernel bandwidth is optimized, the performance instead improves with growing qubit count and becomes competitive with the best classical methods.

Key facts. Cited by 31 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2021.

Builds on

9 of 31 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  2. 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
  3. 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 415
  4. 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 336
  5. 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 328
  6. 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 270
  7. 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 199
  8. 2018To understand deep learning we need to understand kernel learningcited by 186
  9. 2021The Inductive Bias of Quantum Kernelscited by 90

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 5; 2024: 10; 2025: 6; 2026: 6.

31 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2024Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computingcited by 130
  2. 2022Exponential concentration in quantum kernel methodscited by 89
  3. 2023Does provable absence of barren plateaus imply classical simulability?cited by 78
  4. 2022Bandwidth Enables Generalization in Quantum Kernel Modelscited by 32
  5. 2023QKSAN: A Quantum Kernel Self-Attention Networkcited by 23
  6. 2024Quantum Kernel Methods under Scrutiny: A Benchmarking Studycited by 22
  7. 2022The role of entanglement for enhancing the efficiency of quantum kernels towards classificationcited by 10
  8. 2024Benchmarking quantum machine learning kernel training for classification taskscited by 10
  9. 2023Unravelling physics beyond the standard model with classical and quantum anomaly detectioncited by 9
  10. 2023A Hyperparameter Study for Quantum Kernel Methodscited by 9
  11. 2025A Primer on Quantum Machine Learningcited by 9
  12. 2022A kernel-based quantum random forest for improved classificationcited by 7
19 more
  1. 2024Neural auto-designer for enhanced quantum kernelscited by 7
  2. 2024Generalization Error Bound for Quantum Machine Learning in NISQ Era -- A Surveycited by 7
  3. 2024Efficient Parameter Optimisation for Quantum Kernel Alignment: A Sub-sampling Approach in Variational Trainingcited by 6
  4. 2024QuaCK-TSF: Quantum-Classical Kernelized Time Series Forecastingcited by 5
  5. 2023Towards Efficient Quantum Anomaly Detection: One-Class SVMs using Variable Subsampling and Randomized Measurementscited by 2
  6. 2026Non-variational supervised quantum kernel methods: a reviewcited by 2
  7. 2026Benchmarking Quantum Kernel Support Vector Machines Against Classical Baselines on Tabular Data: A Rigorous Empirical Study with Hardware Validationcited by 2
  8. 2024Empowering Credit Scoring Systems with Quantum-Enhanced Machine Learningcited by 1
  9. 2024Quantum enhanced stratification of Breast Cancer: exploring quantum expressivity for real omics datacited by 1
  10. 2025Benign Overfitting with Quantum Kernelscited by 1
  11. 2024Efficient Quantum One-Class Support Vector Machines for Anomaly Detection Using Randomized Measurements and Variable Subsamplingcited by 0
  12. 2025Quantum-Hybrid Support Vector Machines for Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control Systemscited by 0
  13. 2025Is data-efficient learning feasible with quantum models?cited by 0
  14. 2025Quantum feature encoding optimizationcited by 0
  15. 2025Maritime object classification with SAR imagery using quantum kernel methodscited by 0
  16. 2026Geometric and Quantum Kernel Methods for Predicting Skeletal Muscle Outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasecited by 0
  17. 2026Quantum Kernels and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns: Anatomy of a Vanishing Advantagecited by 0
  18. 2026Benchmarking Quantum Machine Learning for Power-System Attack Detection: Evaluation Choices Decide the Outcome Before the Models Docited by 0
  19. 2026Fractal dimension predicts quantum kernel collapse in angle-encoded datacited by 0