mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A State-Vector Framework for Dataset Effects

arXiv 2310.10955 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The impressive success of recent deep neural network (DNN)-based systems is significantly influenced by the high-quality datasets used in training. However, the effects of the datasets, especially how they interact with each other, remain underexplored. We propose a state-vector framework to enable rigorous studies in this direction. This framework uses idealized probing test results as the bases of a vector space. This framework allows us to quantify the effects of both standalone and interacting datasets. We show that the significant effects of some commonly-used language understanding datasets are characteristic and are concentrated on a few linguistic dimensions. Additionally, we observe some ``spill-over'' effects: the datasets could impact the models along dimensions that may seem unrelated to the intended tasks. Our state-vector framework paves the way for a systematic understanding of the dataset effects, a crucial component in responsible and robust model development.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2023.

Builds on

34 of 48 references.

References · 34

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  5. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  6. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  7. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  8. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
  9. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,059
  10. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
  11. 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 1,001
  12. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 958
22 more
  1. 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 815
  2. 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
  3. 2017Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Informationcited by 503
  4. 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 425
  5. 2018SentEval: An Evaluation Toolkit for Universal Sentence Representationscited by 294
  6. 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 291
  7. 2020Data and its (dis)contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning researchcited by 260
  8. 2021ERNIE 3.0: Large-scale Knowledge Enhanced Pre-training for Language Understanding and Generationcited by 260
  9. 2020Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Lengthcited by 232
  10. 2022Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated datacited by 195
  11. 2022Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AIcited by 171
  12. 2020A Theory of Usable Information Under Computational Constraintscited by 162
  13. 2020With Little Power Comes Great Responsibilitycited by 142
  14. 2021Probing Across Time: What Does RoBERTa Know and When?cited by 73
  15. 2020On the Interplay Between Fine-tuning and Sentence-level Probing for Linguistic Knowledge in Pre-trained Transformerscited by 39
  16. 2021Memorisation versus Generalisation in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 32
  17. 2021A Bayesian Framework for Information-Theoretic Probingcited by 22
  18. 2020On Losses for Modern Language Modelscited by 21
  19. 2022When to Use Multi-Task Learning vs Intermediate Fine-Tuning for Pre-Trained Encoder Transfer Learningcited by 17
  20. 2022Predicting Fine-Tuning Performance with Probingcited by 13
  21. 2022Sanity Check for External Clustering Validation Benchmarks using Internal Validation Measurescited by 5
  22. 2022On the data requirements of probingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.