Enhancing Stance Classification on Social Media Using Quantified Moral Foundations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study enhances stance detection on social media by incorporating deeper psychological attributes, specifically individuals' moral foundations. These theoretically-derived dimensions aim to provide a comprehensive profile of an individual's moral concerns which, in recent work, has been linked to behaviour in a range of domains, including society, politics, health, and the environment. In this paper, we investigate how moral foundation dimensions can contribute to predicting an individual's stance on a given target. Specifically we incorporate moral foundation features extracted from text, along with message semantic features, to classify stances at both message- and user-levels using both traditional machine learning models and large language models. Our preliminary results suggest that encoding moral foundations can enhance the performance of stance detection tasks and help illuminate the associations between specific moral foundations and online stances on target topics. The results highlight the importance of considering deeper psychological attributes in stance analysis and underscores the role of moral foundations in guiding online social behavior.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2023.
Builds on
17 of 40 references.
References · 17
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 414
- 2020BERTweet: A pre-trained language model for English Tweetscited by 346
- 2020Zero-Shot Stance Detection: A Dataset and Model using Generalized Topic Representationscited by 97
- 2020Stance Detection on Social Media: State of the Art and Trendscited by 93
- 2023Can we trust the evaluation on ChatGPT?cited by 63
5 more
- 2016Stance and Sentiment in Tweetscited by 62
- 2020Moral Framing and Ideological Bias of Newscited by 29
- 2020FrameAxis: Characterizing Microframe Bias and Intensity with Word Embeddingcited by 21
- 2022A Multi-task Model for Sentiment Aided Stance Detection of Climate Change Tweetscited by 11
- 2023Wearing Masks Implies Refuting Trump?: Towards Target-specific User Stance Prediction across Events in COVID-19 and US Election 2020cited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2026Human Values in a Single Sentence: Moral Presence, Hierarchies, and Transformer Ensembles on the Schwartz Continuumcited by 3
- 2024Predicting User Stances from Target-Agnostic Information using Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Growth First, Care Second? Tracing the Landscape of LLM Value Preferences in Everyday Dilemmascited by 1
- 2026Zero-shot Tweet-Level Stance Detection Enhanced by External Knowledge and Reflective Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Zero-shot Tweet-Level Stance Detection Enhanced by External Knowledge and Reflective Chain-of-Thought Reasoning25 Jun 2026
- 2026Growth First, Care Second? Tracing the Landscape of LLM Value Preferences in Everyday Dilemmas4 Feb 2026
- 2026Human Values in a Single Sentence: Moral Presence, Hierarchies, and Transformer Ensembles on the Schwartz Continuum20 Jan 2026
- 2024Predicting User Stances from Target-Agnostic Information using Large Language Models22 Sep 2024