mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Selectivity Drives Productivity: Efficient Dataset Pruning for Enhanced Transfer Learning

arXiv 2310.08782 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Massive data is often considered essential for deep learning applications, but it also incurs significant computational and infrastructural costs. Therefore, dataset pruning (DP) has emerged as an effective way to improve data efficiency by identifying and removing redundant training samples without sacrificing performance. In this work, we aim to address the problem of DP for transfer learning, i.e., how to prune a source dataset for improved pretraining efficiency and lossless finetuning accuracy on downstream target tasks. To our best knowledge, the problem of DP for transfer learning remains open, as previous studies have primarily addressed DP and transfer learning as separate problems. By contrast, we establish a unified viewpoint to integrate DP with transfer learning and find that existing DP methods are not suitable for the transfer learning paradigm. We then propose two new DP methods, label mapping and feature mapping, for supervised and self-supervised pretraining settings respectively, by revisiting the DP problem through the lens of source-target domain mapping. Furthermore, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on numerous transfer learning tasks. We show that source data classes can be pruned by up to 40% ~ 80% without sacrificing downstream performance, resulting in a significant 2 ~ 5 times speed-up during the pretraining stage. Besides, our proposal exhibits broad applicability and can improve other computationally intensive transfer learning techniques, such as adversarial pretraining. Codes are available at https://github.com/OPTML-Group/DP4TL.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 97 of its 124 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2023.

Builds on

97 of 124 references.

References · 97

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  5. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  6. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  7. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  8. 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,101
  9. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  10. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
  11. 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
  12. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
38 more
  1. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  2. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  3. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,845
  4. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  5. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  6. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,380
  7. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,352
  8. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
  9. 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,106
  10. 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,028
  11. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
  12. 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 897
  13. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 846
  14. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
  15. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  16. 2020Prototypical Contrastive Learning of Unsupervised Representationscited by 640
  17. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
  18. 2018End-to-End Incremental Learningcited by 597
  19. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
  20. 2019Gradient based sample selection for online continual learningcited by 571
  21. 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 533
  22. 2019Self-labelling via simultaneous clustering and representation learningcited by 528
  23. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
  24. 2020Dataset Condensation with Gradient Matchingcited by 516
  25. 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 497
  26. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 425
  27. 2020Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning with Diff Pruningcited by 352
  28. 2017Variational Continual Learningcited by 339
  29. 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 316
  30. 2021Dataset Condensation with Differentiable Siamese Augmentationcited by 291
  31. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  32. 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 283
  33. 2019Towards Efficient Data Valuation Based on the Shapley Valuecited by 281
  34. 2020The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Pre-trained BERT Networkscited by 275
  35. 2022Exploring Visual Prompts for Adapting Large-Scale Modelscited by 274
  36. 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 261
  37. 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 252
  38. 2018Characterizing and Avoiding Negative Transfercited by 229

50 most cited of 97 All 97 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

11 papers.