SSG2: A new modelling paradigm for semantic segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
State-of-the-art models in semantic segmentation primarily operate on single, static images, generating corresponding segmentation masks. This one-shot approach leaves little room for error correction, as the models lack the capability to integrate multiple observations for enhanced accuracy. Inspired by work on semantic change detection, we address this limitation by introducing a methodology that leverages a sequence of observables generated for each static input image. By adding this "temporal" dimension, we exploit strong signal correlations between successive observations in the sequence to reduce error rates. Our framework, dubbed SSG2 (Semantic Segmentation Generation 2), employs a dual-encoder, single-decoder base network augmented with a sequence model. The base model learns to predict the set intersection, union, and difference of labels from dual-input images. Given a fixed target input image and a set of support images, the sequence model builds the predicted mask of the target by synthesizing the partial views from each sequence step and filtering out noise. We evaluate SSG2 across three diverse datasets: UrbanMonitor, featuring orthoimage tiles from Darwin, Australia with five spectral bands and 0.2m spatial resolution; ISPRS Potsdam, which includes true orthophoto images with multiple spectral bands and a 5cm ground sampling distance; and ISIC2018, a medical dataset focused on skin lesion segmentation, particularly melanoma. The SSG2 model demonstrates rapid convergence within the first few tens of epochs and significantly outperforms UNet-like baseline models with the same number of gradient updates. However, the addition of the temporal dimension results in an increased memory footprint. While this could be a limitation, it is offset by the advent of higher-memory GPUs and coding optimizations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2023.
Builds on
22 of 40 references.
References · 22
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
- 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,186
- 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 772
- 2019Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection 2018: A Challenge Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 669
- 2018Albumentations: fast and flexible image augmentationscited by 560
- 2022MaxViT: Multi-Axis Vision Transformercited by 476
- 2020Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlationcited by 425
- 2019ResUNet-a: a deep learning framework for semantic segmentation of remotely sensed datacited by 261
- 2022Patches Are All You Need?cited by 201
- 2020U-Net and its variants for medical image segmentation: theory and applicationscited by 169
10 more
- 2021UNetFormer: A UNet-like Transformer for Efficient Semantic Segmentation of Remote Sensing Urban Scene Imagerycited by 167
- 2017Deep learning in remote sensing: a reviewcited by 128
- 2019Deep Semantic Segmentation of Natural and Medical Images: A Reviewcited by 125
- 2020DoubleU-Net: A Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 125
- 2017Beyond RGB: Very High Resolution Urban Remote Sensing With Multimodal Deep Networkscited by 64
- 2016Fully Convolutional Networks for Dense Semantic Labelling of High-Resolution Aerial Imagerycited by 36
- 2022DuAT: Dual-Aggregation Transformer Network for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 22
- 2018Dynamic Multi-Context Segmentation of Remote Sensing Images based on Convolutional Networkscited by 15
- 2020Looking for change? Roll the Dice and demand Attentioncited by 15
- 2023High Performance W-stacking for Imaging Radio Astronomy Data: a Parallel and Accelerated Solutioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.