20/20 Vision Language Models: A Prescription for Better VLMs through Data Curation Alone
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Data curation has shifted the quality-compute frontier for language-model and contrastive image-text pretraining, but its role for vision-language models (VLMs) is far less established. We ask how far data curation alone can take VLM performance, holding architecture, training recipe, and compute fixed and varying only the training data. Our pipeline, applied to the MAmmoTH-VL single-image subset, lifts performance by +11.7pp on average across 20 public VLM benchmarks (spanning grounding, VQA, OCR/documents, captioning, spatial/3D, counting, charts, math, brand-ID, and multi-image reasoning) and by +11.3pp on average across all nine capability axes of DatBench, our high-fidelity VLM eval suite. At 2B, our curated model surpasses InternVL3.5-2B by 9.9pp at ~17x less training compute and closes the gap to Qwen3-VL-2B to within 1.8pp at ~87x less compute, from pretraining alone. Beyond accuracy, curation delivers four further properties: (1) Reliability: per-capability std across training seeds drops by ~67% and the lift survives a 4k-to-16k context-length sweep; (2) OOD generalization: the 9-eval OOD average rises by +7.2pp, and multi-image BLINK rises by +3.09pp despite single-image-only training, with Visual Correspondence gaining +11.8pp; (3) Behavioral gains beyond benchmarks: across ~1,100 open-ended queries the curated 2B is more honest and more specific than the matched-compute baseline, and more concise and less refusal-prone than a frontier 2B reference; (4) Pareto-dominance on inference cost: at every scale (1B, 2B, 4B) the curated model raises accuracy while lowering response FLOPs vs. the matched-compute baseline, and the curated 4B matches near-frontier accuracy at 3.3x lower response FLOPs than Qwen3-VL-4B. Data curation is a high-leverage tool for building better VLMs, reaching near-frontier accuracy at up to ~150x less training compute.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 78 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2026.
Builds on
78 of 88 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2025FineVision: Open Data Is All You Need20 Oct
- 2024Building and better understanding vision-language models: insights and future directions22 Aug
- 2024PaliGemma: A versatile 3B VLM for transfer10 Jul
- 2024What matters when building vision-language models?3 May
- 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?29 Mar
- 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond24 Aug
- 2023Teaching CLIP to Count to Ten23 Feb
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning29 Apr
Other references · 70
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
- 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
- 2023InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Taskscited by 2,534
- 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
- 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,696
- 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,624
- 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,288
38 more
- 2023MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilitiescited by 1,221
- 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,127
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,104
- 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,054
- 2024How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suitescited by 1,033
- 2023ShareGPT4V: Improving Large Multi-Modal Models with Better Captionscited by 1,000
- 2023SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehensioncited by 929
- 2024Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMscited by 822
- 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 719
- 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 705
- 2023Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHFcited by 703
- 2025Vision-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 653
- 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 635
- 2024BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceivecited by 529
- 2025VLM-R1: A Stable and Generalizable R1-style Large Vision-Language Modelcited by 515
- 2025Visual-RFT: Visual Reinforcement Fine-Tuningcited by 501
- 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 475
- 2023OCRBench: On the Hidden Mystery of OCR in Large Multimodal Modelscited by 466
- 2023RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy MLLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedbackcited by 404
- 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 381
- 2020Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models: Weight Initializations, Data Orders, and Early Stoppingcited by 377
- 2023SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplicationcited by 295
- 2023Demystifying CLIP Datacited by 265
- 2023Data Filtering Networkscited by 247
- 2024MM1: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Multimodal LLM Pre-trainingcited by 230
- 2020GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learningcited by 224
- 2024Aligning Modalities in Vision Large Language Models via Preference Fine-tuningcited by 197
- 2021Accounting for Variance in Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 195
- 2024RedPajama: an Open Dataset for Training Large Language Modelscited by 178
- 2024Nemotron-CC: Transforming Common Crawl into a Refined Long-Horizon Pretraining Datasetcited by 153
- 2018TallyQA: Answering Complex Counting Questionscited by 152
- 2023D4: Improving LLM Pretraining via Document De-Duplication and Diversificationcited by 146
- 2024Eagle: Exploring The Design Space for Multimodal LLMs with Mixture of Encoderscited by 137
- 2023Silkie: Preference Distillation for Large Visual Language Modelscited by 128
- 2024MAmmoTH-VL: Eliciting Multimodal Reasoning with Instruction Tuning at Scalecited by 125
- 2024NVLM: Open Frontier-Class Multimodal LLMscited by 124
- 2021Do Transformer Modifications Transfer Across Implementations and Applications?cited by 87
- 2024What If We Recaption Billions of Web Images with LLaMA-3?cited by 82
50 most cited of 70 All 70 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Trust the Model: Compact VLMs as In-Context Judges for Image-Text Data Quality
- 2025Data Metabolism: An Efficient Data Design Schema For Vision Language Model
- 2024Probing Visual Language Priors in VLMs
- 2021SimVLM: Simple Visual Language Model Pretraining with Weak Supervision
- 2025Better Reasoning with Less Data: Enhancing VLMs Through Unified Modality Scoring
- 2023Synthesize, Diagnose, and Optimize: Towards Fine-Grained Vision-Language Understanding
- 2025A Survey on Efficient Vision-Language Models
- 2026VLM-RobustBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Robustness of Vision-Language Models