mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Contextualized Policy Recovery: Modeling and Interpreting Medical Decisions with Adaptive Imitation Learning

arXiv 2310.07918 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2023cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 4

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Safe offline RL

Abstract (arXiv)

Interpretable policy learning seeks to estimate intelligible decision policies from observed actions; however, existing models force a tradeoff between accuracy and interpretability, limiting data-driven interpretations of human decision-making processes. Fundamentally, existing approaches are burdened by this tradeoff because they represent the underlying decision process as a universal policy, when in fact human decisions are dynamic and can change drastically under different contexts. Thus, we develop Contextualized Policy Recovery (CPR), which re-frames the problem of modeling complex decision processes as a multi-task learning problem, where each context poses a unique task and complex decision policies can be constructed piece-wise from many simple context-specific policies. CPR models each context-specific policy as a linear map, and generates new policy models textiton-demand as contexts are updated with new observations. We provide two flavors of the CPR framework: one focusing on exact local interpretability, and one retaining full global interpretability. We assess CPR through studies on simulated and real data, achieving state-of-the-art performance on predicting antibiotic prescription in intensive care units (+22% AUROC vs. previous SOTA) and predicting MRI prescription for Alzheimer's patients (+7.7% AUROC vs. previous SOTA). With this improvement, CPR closes the accuracy gap between interpretable and black-box methods, allowing high-resolution exploration and analysis of context-specific decision models.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safe offline RL, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 11 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2023.

Builds on

11 of 49 references.

References · 11

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  4. 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,597
  5. 2017Distilling a Neural Network Into a Soft Decision Treecited by 236
  6. 2018Programmatically Interpretable Reinforcement Learningcited by 193
  7. 2019Imitation Learning via Off-Policy Distribution Matchingcited by 183
  8. 2017Deeply AggreVaTeD: Differentiable Imitation Learning for Sequential Predictioncited by 93
  9. 2017Contextual Explanation Networkscited by 21
  10. 2020What Did You Think Would Happen? Explaining Agent Behaviour Through Intended Outcomescited by 20
  11. 2022POETREE: Interpretable Policy Learning with Adaptive Decision Treescited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Offline Inverse Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Safe-Critical Decision Making in Healthcare
  2. 2019Inverse Reinforcement Learning in Contextual MDPs
  3. 2025Evaluating Interpretable Reinforcement Learning by Distilling Policies into Programs
  4. 2024Pruning the Path to Optimal Care: Identifying Systematically Suboptimal Medical Decision-Making with Inverse Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2022Inverse Online Learning: Understanding Non-Stationary and Reactionary Policies
  6. 2024Identifying Differential Patient Care Through Inverse Intent Inference
  7. 2020Automatic Discovery of Interpretable Planning Strategies
  8. 2026Formally Verifying and Explaining Sepsis Treatment Policies with COOL-MC