mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multiview Transformer: Rethinking Spatial Information in Hyperspectral Image Classification

arXiv 2310.07186 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2023cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Identifying the land cover category for each pixel in a hyperspectral image (HSI) relies on spectral and spatial information. An HSI cuboid with a specific patch size is utilized to extract spatial-spectral feature representation for the central pixel. In this article, we investigate that scene-specific but not essential correlations may be recorded in an HSI cuboid. This additional information improves the model performance on existing HSI datasets and makes it hard to properly evaluate the ability of a model. We refer to this problem as the spatial overfitting issue and utilize strict experimental settings to avoid it. We further propose a multiview transformer for HSI classification, which consists of multiview principal component analysis (MPCA), spectral encoder-decoder (SED), and spatial-pooling tokenization transformer (SPTT). MPCA performs dimension reduction on an HSI via constructing spectral multiview observations and applying PCA on each view data to extract low-dimensional view representation. The combination of view representations, named multiview representation, is the dimension reduction output of the MPCA. To aggregate the multiview information, a fully-convolutional SED with a U-shape in spectral dimension is introduced to extract a multiview feature map. SPTT transforms the multiview features into tokens using the spatial-pooling tokenization strategy and learns robust and discriminative spatial-spectral features for land cover identification. Classification is conducted with a linear classifier. Experiments on three HSI datasets with rigid settings demonstrate the superiority of the proposed multiview transformer over the state-of-the-art methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2023.

Builds on

13 of 44 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  5. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  6. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  7. 2015Recent Advances in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 360
  8. 2021SpectralFormer: Rethinking Hyperspectral Image Classification with Transformerscited by 168
  9. 2013A Survey on Multi-view Learningcited by 152
  10. 2017Deep learning in remote sensing: a reviewcited by 128
  11. 2020Graph Convolutional Networks for Hyperspectral Image Classificationcited by 113
  12. 2021Hyperspectral Image Classification-Traditional to Deep Models: A Survey for Future Prospectscited by 49
1 more
  1. 2016Towards Better Exploiting Convolutional Neural Networks for Remote Sensing Scene Classificationcited by 29

Built on by

Not cited yet.