mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

The potential of large language models for improving probability learning: A study on ChatGPT3.5 and first-year computer engineering students

arXiv 2310.05686 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we assess the efficacy of ChatGPT (version Feb 2023), a large-scale language model, in solving probability problems typically presented in introductory computer engineering exams. Our study comprised a set of 23 probability exercises administered to students at Rey Juan Carlos University (URJC) in Madrid. The responses produced by ChatGPT were evaluated by a group of five statistics professors, who assessed them qualitatively and assigned grades based on the same criteria used for students. Our results indicate that ChatGPT surpasses the average student in terms of phrasing, organization, and logical reasoning. The model's performance remained consistent for both the Spanish and English versions of the exercises. However, ChatGPT encountered difficulties in executing basic numerical operations. Our experiments demonstrate that requesting ChatGPT to provide the solution in the form of an R script proved to be an effective approach for overcoming these limitations. In summary, our results indicate that ChatGPT surpasses the average student in solving probability problems commonly presented in introductory computer engineering exams. Nonetheless, the model exhibits limitations in reasoning around certain probability concepts. The model's ability to deliver high-quality explanations and illustrate solutions in any programming language, coupled with its performance in solving probability exercises, suggests that large language models have the potential to serve as learning assistants.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2023.

Builds on

12 of 33 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,106
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,320
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,856
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,502
  5. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,348
  6. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,117
  7. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,972
  8. 2023Augmented Language Models: a Surveycited by 403
  9. 2023Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPTcited by 267
  10. 2023A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failurescited by 168
  11. 2021RedditBias: A Real-World Resource for Bias Evaluation and Debiasing of Conversational Language Modelscited by 149
  12. 2023Let's have a chat! A Conversation with ChatGPT: Technology, Applications, and Limitationscited by 16

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Assessing the Impact of Prompting Methods on ChatGPT's Mathematical Capabilities
  2. 2023Have LLMs Advanced Enough? A Challenging Problem Solving Benchmark For Large Language Models
  3. 2025EngiBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Engineering Problem Solving
  4. 2025UGMathBench: A Diverse and Dynamic Benchmark for Undergraduate-Level Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Models
  5. 2025Large Language Models Don't Make Sense of Word Problems. A Scoping Review from a Mathematics Education Perspective
  6. 2023ChatGPT as a Math Questioner? Evaluating ChatGPT on Generating Pre-university Math Questions
  7. 2023SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Models
  8. 2025Evaluating Large Language Models on the 2026 Korean CSAT Mathematics Exam: Measuring Mathematical Ability in a Zero-Data-Leakage Setting