mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating Large Language Models on the 2026 Korean CSAT Mathematics Exam: Measuring Mathematical Ability in a Zero-Data-Leakage Setting

arXiv 2511.18649 ↗First posted 23 Nov 2025cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

This study systematically evaluated the mathematical reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) using the 2026 Korean College Scholastic Ability Test (CSAT) Mathematics section, ensuring a completely contamination-free evaluation environment. To address data leakage issues in existing benchmarks, we digitized all 46 questions (22 common and 24 elective) within two hours of the exam's public release, eliminating any possibility of inclusion in model training data. We conducted comprehensive evaluations of 24 state-of-the-art LLMs across varying input modalities (Text-only, Image-only, Text+Figure) and prompt languages (Korean, English). The GPT-5 family models achieved perfect scores (100 points) under a limited set of language-modality configurations, while Grok 4, Qwen 3 235B, and Gemini 2.5 pro also scored above 97 points. Notably, gpt-oss-20B achieved 95.7 points despite its relatively small size, demonstrating high cost-effectiveness. Problem-specific analysis revealed Calculus as the weakest domain with significant performance degradation on 4-point high-difficulty problems. Text input consistently outperformed image input, while prompt language effects varied by model scale. In reasoning enhancement experiments with GPT-5 series, increased reasoning intensity improved performance (82.6->100 points) but quadrupled token usage and drastically reduced efficiency, suggesting that models with minimal reasoning may be more practical. This research contributes: (1) implementation of a completely unexposed evaluation environment, (2) a standardized digitization pipeline that converts human-targeted exam materials into LLM-ready evaluation data, and (3) a practical evaluation perspective integrating performance, cost, and time considerations. Detailed results and model comparisons are available at the 2026 Korean CSAT LLM Evaluation Leaderboard; https://isoft.cnu.ac.kr/csat2026/

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024A Careful Examination of Large Language Model Performance on Grade School Arithmetic
  2. 2025Evaluation of LLMs for mathematical problem solving
  3. 2024Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models: A Focus on Error Identification and Correction
  4. 2024FineMath: A Fine-Grained Mathematical Evaluation Benchmark for Chinese Large Language Models
  5. 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models
  6. 2025Understand, Solve and Translate: Bridging the Multilingual Mathematical Reasoning Gap
  7. 2023Have LLMs Advanced Enough? A Challenging Problem Solving Benchmark For Large Language Models
  8. 2023CMATH: Can Your Language Model Pass Chinese Elementary School Math Test?